На главнуюНовости и политикаПохожее видеоЕще от: CNN

Neil deGrasse Tyson scolds cherry picking climate science

Оценок: 15746 | Просмотров: 983644
Astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson says lawmakers and the media cherry pick scientific papers to reinforce political ideals on climate change and says it's irresponsible to create public policy while ignoring the scientific community's consensus.
Html code for embedding videos on your blog
Текстовые комментарии (6588)
Shadowryuu (12 часов назад)
1 year later... Nasa suddenly talks about a new "mini ice age"... i knew why i always stayed passiv to the whole thing
Jimbo Jones (1 день назад)
The governments scientists are paid by government and so are politically driven.
Craig irey (1 день назад)
I should have known better than to click on a CNN post, I agree they are cherry picking science in regards to global warming but its in an attempt to make people believe its real or fact and its NOT, it's a LIE! Shame on you CNN!
Robert Stephenson (2 дня назад)
Here’s a climate scientist :- https://youtu.be/fA5sGtj7QKQ
Where is the Wikipedia disclaimer!!!!!
Jason Crockford (3 дня назад)
I thought this guy had credibility. Obviously not.
dsedew efeferf (3 дня назад)
technocrates should never govern..... humans
Lord Pax (4 дня назад)
Correlation is not causation. Yes climate change is real. It has been for the billions of years earth has existed. Derp.
sharku240 (4 дня назад)
I never thought I’d hear him make a mistake, but he messed up the Lincoln date
312eastwest (4 дня назад)
How can you know climate change is man made, if you don't know to which degree Chandlers wobble, Milankovitch cycle, sun spots, gravity, jet streams etc affect it? Climate change sounds more like brainwashing propaganda, than a settled science, notice how Bill Nye, and Neil DeGrasse are not climate scientists, I'm told my opinion is not valid since i'm not a climate scientist.
Jr Animator (4 дня назад)
stop this fucking debate and let's just fix the damn problem. jesus fucking christ.
Jr Animator (4 дня назад)
i would totally live in a communist country ran only by scientists. i put my faith to them more than i believe in jesus.
Jarrold Bates (7 дней назад)
Don't hold china or india or other 3rd world big polluters accountable.Bird killing wind turbines and solar are gaining popularity in the US. Blame the US where coal has and will continue to decline in use.
Kingブランドン (7 дней назад)
Global Warming was rebranded as Climate Change, so I should stop doing what? I work at a door shop, not a fucking plant that burns exhaust... Seriously, wtf is this shit my fault? If it's real, then why the fuck is anybody doing anything about it? China should be a global threat to everyone's health, but ironically everyone is trillion of dollars in debt to them. Makes a whole lot of sense~
Jungle Jargon (8 дней назад)
If you are worried about climate change, plant trees.
John Holborn (8 дней назад)
"Cherry Picking" is done by Both sides, Pro and Con climate change scientific evidence.
Sachin Koparde (9 дней назад)
Hurricanes there we don't knowwww.. Shoo I stay ? Should I goooo?🎵🎶
Zsavage1 (11 дней назад)
I have a lot of respect for Mr. Tyson.. but Sir your facts need rework... the largest hurricane ever recorded was in 1979... diameter of 1,380 mi (2,220 km). This is almost double the previous record of 700 miles (1,130 km) set by Typhoon Marge in August of 1951. At its largest size, Tip was nearly as big as half of the United States... and they fluctuate all through recorded history.. the climate may be changing (a tiny bit) but the earth is evolving.. and will not stop doing so no matter what we do...and over the last 200 years.. of global temperatures it has changed maybe 1 half of a degree.. .seem pretty steady to me... and i'm no scientist .. so to Mr. Tyson.. I say get your head out of the clouds..
Ace B (12 дней назад)
He knows it, cuz he does it too.
Amigo 7 (12 дней назад)
What are the benefits of Gloabal Warming. Co2 is essentially plant food. Plants need it to grow, without Co2 we would basically go extinct. in addition Scientist were predicting Global Cooling 40 years ago and just maybe the world was spared a new glacier era by Co2 effect on our climate. Yea! Co2 is our friend. I think people should produce more Co2 and feed the world.
Warren Peece (12 дней назад)
The reason that the majority of research regarding man made global warming tilts in one direction is because there is no funding for any research that questions it. .
Word (14 дней назад)
The only way to stop the earth from warming is to pay more tax to the government.
Kingブランドン (7 дней назад)
Lol... This dude gets it~ You made my day, Sir!
Gist Erme (16 дней назад)
How do you establish a scientific truth if not by looking at the consensus of scientific experiments and scientific observation? You lie about it...the bucks are huge. Science has never been about "consensus". In this case, IMO, economics supported by pseudo-science is the basis of the IPCC "consensus". How convenient! So...how much has sea level risen in the last 20 years? I can tell you first hand that in the part of the Pacific coast that I have visited and walked nearly daily since the '60s, there has been no noticeable change. Maybe the water is just heaping up someplace else...can water do that? Or maybe this Global Warming fear-mongering represents the biggest swindle attempt in human history. Just send your money and we'll make sure to stop climate change! However, given the apparent lack of "warming" for the last couple of decades, the campaign's name needed revision. Hence "climate change", a fact of this planet that none can deny, a fact that has been so since long before humans built their first fire. Now THERE'S an inconvenient truth.
Tim Kayjr (16 дней назад)
Eric Joiner (16 дней назад)
Climate change research, waste of money.
Sticks and Stones with Mike. (16 дней назад)
No matter your position on the climate, please limit what you throw out as in plastics & chemicals :D
Mike Oz (17 дней назад)
Tyson is a fool.
alex droogy (17 дней назад)
Sounds like Tyson is describing and criticizing himself, as he cherry picks his way through the climate science fraud of which he is a willing Useful-Idiot. Oh well, gives him something to do. As for me ... I am going down to the shoreline that is right where it has been since my Great-great Grandparents first went walking and swimming on the same beaches in the late 1800s. Let me know when this CATASTROPHIC SEA-LEVEL RISE thing actually really starts ! LOLLLLLLLLLLLLLL
David Crabtree (18 дней назад)
Neil, you are the expert or so you say there are very detailed criticisms give me something other than charm
De Factio (19 дней назад)
Charlatan, liar, thief.
BGW Yay (19 дней назад)
“Distinguished Scientist and Astro physicist”. LOL. He’s another actor. Science was hijacked around 1958.
John Smith (20 дней назад)
So tyson thinks objective truth is when enough people believe it. Science has as much credibility as scientology these days. Hard science is racist and oppressive i guess
Russell Fedorov (20 дней назад)
all of the information and data that we have is cherry picked by the government and is persuading the gullible into believing something that is simply untrue to gain more power and control over the weak, and before you leave hate comments please do yourself a favor and research multiple sources about this topic and come up with an opinion on your own without anyone else telling you what to think. I wish you all the best
Leonard McCreary (20 дней назад)
Ya know who doesn’t cherry pick? CNN. Haha. Ahahahahaha!
Benjamin Carter (20 дней назад)
A certain statistical threshold has to be crossed for a theory to be accepted. From there, the theory is more widely accepted once tested in the real world. Man made climate change via carbon dioxide fails both. Data has been cherry picked to 'prove' climate change, and the predictive models generated from the cherry picked data are extremely inaccurate and unreliable.
Darren Hawkins (21 день назад)
Neil degrasse full of shit tyson, just another brown tongue mason
Bill K (21 день назад)
How did Abraham Lincoln do that in 1963?
True World (21 день назад)
Good liar keeping a straight face,The truth.....NASA document 1207, states that the earth is FLAT and non ROTATIONAL .108 page document of the derivation of a linear aircraft,now unclassified document on the maths and the mechanics physics of the structure and flight of an aircraft on a Flat non ROTATIONAL Earth.Stick that right up your global arsehole and join the majority.
Mable Sim (21 день назад)
Sure this guy is a scientist? Science never proof anything is right. A large body of work pointing in the same direction consent with one another does not make it the truth. It takes just one scientist to disprove the rest to make a hypothesis wrong.
David Cuthbertson (21 день назад)
This guy is full of it - Trump says that scientist have a political agenda - I know this is a fact. This guy is a leftist that believes that the elite need to make all the decisions. Global warming caused by man - is a MYTH - no question about it.
SkidRow (22 дня назад)
So unscientific. Didn't he know gay marriage caused the hurricanes? (this is a ironic remark, btw)
Azathoth Asul morgul (22 дня назад)
Those who blindly obey are no different then the nazi they too had blind faith in hitler wen humans need no more leaders stop following any but thyself then will politicians,priests,etc have no more power to do their evil
Azathoth Asul morgul (22 дня назад)
They will never accept the truth anout global warming because most of dem are religious who will just say wen thebshit hits the fan its gods wrath and humankind will go extinct
K162KingPin (22 дня назад)
If "human activity" caused the hurricane then what caused all the hurricanes before humans were around? There is no question that the climate is changing. The only thing being debated by real scientist and interested people is whether or not and if so how much humans have to do with it. It is easy to look at a storm and say "SEE CLIMATE CHANGE... ""WE"" ARE DESTROYING THE PLANET"". Then people think. Well he must be right. That sure looks like climate change and he did point it out so humans must also be destroying the planet. Proving climate change does NOT mean humans are responsible. Our planet has gone though a great many drastic climate changes throughout the past 100 million years alone. NONE of them could be blamed on humans as we were not around yet. Are we to imagine that the dinosaurs were driving around cars and polluting the atmosphere. I think not. So why is it that with overwhelming evidence of dozens of climate changes in the past before humans were ever around why is it that this one is getting blamed on us? PROVING CLIMATE CHANGE DOES NOT PROVE HUMANS ARE RESPONSIBLE. Yet it would be nice if we took better care of our planet. Hopefully in time we will learn how. That doesn't mean we are responsible for climate change any more than a flee is responsible for what kind of food a dog likes to eat. This is nothing more than the same old sunday sermon that preacher have been using for thousands of years. "YOU are a SINNER and now you have to PAY. "ME". And I will make you right with god." They just changed "god" to "mother earth". If we give them billions of dollars for their pet projects they will save us from the consequences of sin that we have brought upon ourselves. Oh and while you are at it a little reverence for their overwhelming superiority wouldn't hurt. After all they are our self proclaimed saviors. Give me a break already.
Stephen Konig (22 дня назад)
Where is Morgan Freeman? Everyone understands things better when Morgan Freeman explains it.
Cosmoslogic (22 дня назад)
Follow the money and you will find out the truth!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
James Madison (22 дня назад)
Does our star affect our weather? Do volcanoes affect our weather? Do forest fires affect weather? How about the phrase "recorded history"? What was weather like in 1235 in USA? What era of weather do you want it to always be? Year of 1953? 1972? Solar minimum? Sunspots? Anyone care to speak to the LONG history of changing weather on earth? Why not? Oh, right....it changes. Used to be "Global warming"....that didn't work out (see global temps going down due to solar minimum) so now it is "climate change" implying we don't want climate to change? Ever? Yes, pollution is bad, obviously. Why don't we go after pollution on that basis alone? Because someone, guess who, wants to tax, tax, tax our way to less pollution. Sure....but you still drive your car and your home uses electricity, right? Shop at a grocery store? Yep.
Cosmoslogic (22 дня назад)
If you don't have peoples best interests in mind then you are failing humanity no matter what capacity it is.
b5ranger001 (22 дня назад)
Abraham Lincoln was not alive in 1963 @ 1:38 (listen for 15 seconds from here), what a moron.
Rider (23 дня назад)
The real experts don't dress like movie stars and spend all their time being chauffeured to and from TV studios. Neil deGrasse Tyson is to science what Barack Hussein Obama is to politics. All tackle box and no fish.
Bill Andrews (23 дня назад)
As Svante Arrhenius stated in 1896 in his Nobel Prize-winning paper: "The intensity of radiation for any group of rays should always diminish with increasing quantities of aqueous vapor (water vapor), or carbonic acid (carbon dioxide), traversed. If a ray of heat, corresponding to the angle of deviation 39.45 degrees, passes through the unit of carbonic acid, it decreases in intensity in the proportion 1: 0.934 (log= - 0.0296), the corresponding value for the unit of water vapor is 1: 0.775 (log= -0.1105)." AS Arhennius states as the amount of Co2 or water vapor increases the amount of Sun heat able to reach and warm the Earth diminishes. NASA confirms this at their website dedicated to infrared astronomy here: http://coolcosmos.ipac.caltech.edu/cosmic_classroom/ir_tutorial/irwindows.html "The Universe sends us light at all wavelengths of the electromagnetic spectrum. However, most of this light does not reach us at ground level here on Earth. Why? Because we have an atmosphere which blocks out many types of radiation while letting other types through. Fortunately for life on Earth, our atmosphere blocks out harmful, high energy radiation like X-rays, gamma rays and most of the ultraviolet rays. It also blocks out most infrared radiation, as well as very low energy radio waves. On the other hand, our atmosphere lets the visible light, most radio waves, and small wavelength ranges of infrared light through, allowing astronomers to view the Universe at these wavelengths. Most of the infrared light coming to us from the Universe is absorbed by water vapor and carbon dioxide in the Earth's atmosphere. Only in a few narrow wavelength ranges, can infrared light make it through (at least partially) to a ground-based infrared telescope. The Earth's atmosphere causes another problem for infrared astronomers. The atmosphere itself radiates strongly in the infrared, often putting out more infrared light than the object in space being observed. This atmospheric infrared emission peaks at a wavelength of about 10 microns (micron is short for a micrometer or one-millionth of a meter). So the best view of the infrared universe, from ground-based telescopes, are at infrared wavelengths which can pass through the Earth's atmosphere and at which the atmosphere is dim in the infrared. Ground-based infrared observatories are usually placed near the summit of high, dry mountains to get above as much of the atmosphere as possible. Even so, most infrared wavelengths are completely absorbed by the atmosphere and never make it to the ground." Water vapor is the most powerful Greenhouse GAs, but clouds are made of it and clouds cool the Earth, a fact admitted by the IPCC. Since Water Vapor and CO2 are both greenhouse gases that do the same thing, more CO2 will have the same effect as more water vapor. More water vapor or more CO2 will, as Arrhenius stated in 1896, absorb more incoming Sun heat and cool the earth. A cooler earth will give off laess heat and so the Greenhosue Effect will fall as thre will be less ehat to refelct back. NOW how mucyh of the heat is reflected back by the CO2 and water vapro? NASA tells us at this website: https://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/Features/EnergyBalance/page6.php "Just as the major atmospheric gases (oxygen and nitrogen) are transparent to incoming sunlight, they are also transparent to outgoing thermal infrared. However, water vapor, carbon dioxide, methane, and other trace gases are opaque to many wavelengths of thermal infrared energy. Remember that the surface radiates the net equivalent of 17 percent of incoming solar energy as thermal infrared. However, the amount that directly escapes to space is only about 12 percent of incoming solar energy. The remaining fraction—a net 5-6 percent of incoming solar energy—is transferred to the atmosphere when greenhouse gas molecules absorb thermal infrared energy radiated by the surface. When greenhouse gas molecules absorb thermal infrared energy, their temperature rises. Like coals from a fire that are warm but not glowing, greenhouse gases then radiate an increased amount of thermal infrared energy in all directions. Heat radiated upward continues to encounter greenhouse gas molecules; those molecules absorb the heat, their temperature rises, and the amount of heat they radiate increases. At an altitude of roughly 5-6 kilometers, the concentration of greenhouse gases in the overlying atmosphere is so small that heat can radiate freely to space. Because greenhouse gas molecules radiate heat in all directions, some of it spreads downward and ultimately comes back into contact with the Earth’s surface, where it is absorbed. The temperature of the surface becomes warmer than it would be if it were heated only by direct solar heating. This supplemental heating of the Earth’s surface by the atmosphere is the natural greenhouse effect. Why doesn’t the natural greenhouse effect cause a runaway increase in surface temperature? Remember that the amount of energy a surface radiates always increases faster than its temperature rises—outgoing energy increases with the fourth power of temperature. As solar heating and “back radiation” from the atmosphere raise the surface temperature, the surface simultaneously releases an increasing amount of heat—equivalent to about 117 percent of incoming solar energy. The net upward heat flow, then, is equivalent to 17 percent of incoming sunlight (117 percent up minus 100 percent down)." So much for Mr. Tyson's religion of AGW!
Michael Higgins (23 дня назад)
Neil needs to go back to school and take a few courses from Professor Lindzen. He will change his mind instead of the climate.
luuke luketer (23 дня назад)
stop india & china from producing babies and producing junk............50% solved..........
RazzleberryJam (24 дня назад)
Woah what? How you guys get Wikipedia to show up above the video title?!
Wilhelm Nymark (24 дня назад)
Well if you are a nation with a competetive advantage based on coal and oil the easy thing to do is cherry pick studies that questions man made climate change. Also if you are a nation that largely consists of fat-asses named Bob who wants cheap fuel for his fat-ass truck and to get him to vote for you its also easy to do the same.
Blake Clem (24 дня назад)
Ndgt for president
John Oakley (24 дня назад)
The scientific evidence does not "lean towards" man-made climate change. The scientific models have been wrong consistently, because the feedback hypothesized is not happening to a scale large enough to conclude it is happening. The cherry picking on the other side can be pointed to specifically. For example, the years before the industrial revolution show an increase in temperature, but that is cut off the data deliberately because it is not supportive of the desired conclusion. There are many times where the CO2 and other gas levels have been much higher than today and the environment was cooler. Correlation does not prove causality, and if it did, it would argue against your random guess.
Internet Connection (25 дней назад)
Climit change is a hoax propigated by libtards to save the trees and some endangered owl so we can’t dig for cole
Duper's Delight (25 дней назад)
What a joke. Do you really mean to tell me that Neil deGrasse Tyson and CNN don't "cherry pick" science?
mike n (25 дней назад)
You Tube Dr. Patrick Michaels on Mark Levin Show...IF YOU REALLY WANT THE TRUTH!!!!!!!!!
mike n (25 дней назад)
Neil is a snake oil salesman...A phony who propagates lies.....our major cities along with water edge will flood over..really...LOL
NATHAN M. (25 дней назад)
https://youtu.be/fA5sGtj7QKQ Oops
Carlos Sosa (25 дней назад)
This guy is a class A charlatan.
Freedom Works (26 дней назад)
Neal. Your are a fucking moron
Robert Williamson (26 дней назад)
Back in the 1950s it was the scientific consensus that the continents were fixed in place and did not move... Only a coincidence that it looked like Africa and the east coast of the Americas looked like they might have fit together before.. Thats what they taught us when we were kids in school back then. Any scientist that argued against that concensus before the early 1960s was laughed out of the lecture halls....blacklisted from the scientific community... and had one hell of a time tying to get published... Good example.... Dr. Alfred Wegener......they laughed at him......sadly he died before being proven right.. Science should NEVER be done by concensus..... . It would take only one person to prove all the others wrong...
Robert Williamson (26 дней назад)
So damned funny.. The leftist Gore Bull Warming/Climate Change Alarmist Thermophobic idiots cherry pick all the time... and Tyson accused the other side of cherry picking.. Want to know what the leftist/socialist/Marxist-Lenists are doing ? ? See what they are accusing their opponents of. Thats what the leftist/socialist/Marxist-Lenists Warming Alarmists are actually doing themselves...... As far as Neil deGrasse Tyson goes... he should stick to Astrophysics...Hes good at that. ..... He knows next to nothing of Paleoclimatology. And he might be a socialist/Marxist-Leninis behind closed doors.... Having lots of high university education degree letters behind ones name is no gaurantee of honesty and high moral standards.
David Semick (26 дней назад)
"To cherry-pick science is an odd thing for a scientist to observe". Really? Hardly. Many  participate in not just cherry-picked science, but faux "common sense" science as well, to retain their government funding.
Brian Boru (26 дней назад)
He was absolutely and beautifully right about everything he said, until he said, "That's what we have with climate change..." Because the computer models based on 'the system' he invokes have failed. The global temperature, especially in the tropics, is nowhere near as warm as they predicted. There are plenty of scientific people who know this, and who disagree with dogmatic scaremongers like Tyson.
Ed Ho (26 дней назад)
Millions and millions of $$$ back up the side of science that scream global warming anf they dont want to let go of that money. The other big side of science says there should not be global warming hysteria and that's true
machia0705 (26 дней назад)
Only the Russian model uses no projections . What is happening now already happened between 1920-1945. This warning trend is entirely cyclical in all probability . Take politics out of it ! This way both sides can study it and determine if it really is different than all the other warming cycles in history.
davidyanceyjr (26 дней назад)
The objective truth. Climate is changing. The Earth is warming. The weather models predicted global temperature models are in-accurate, the discrepancies from actual temperatures are increasing with time. Storm intensity is measured by damage inflicted, based on economic factors, inflation, and increase in population storms are no more powerful now than 100 years ago. Humans are not responsible.
wade cooper (27 дней назад)
I still have not heard a scientist properly explain the 2 degrees of heat F. and why that is so dangerous, why the glaciers are disappearing but the ice shelfs in the winter get bigger. It's obvious to me, it is common sense and few scientists have any of it. Niel has some but it is in a narrow field. He still believes in the theory of evolution for Christ's sake. DNA is a complex computer code written in digital quadrinary programming.
Halcyon (27 дней назад)
I don't go to a GP when I'm ill. I know he can do nothing of real value to stop whatever discomfort I have. He can't even make a good diagnosis. I see alternative practitioners and use old fashioned remedies which I know will actually have a positive effect.
rizon72 (27 дней назад)
The biggest problem is the CC cult, yes its a cult as well, doesn't want any questions. I saw this change over the years and its the biggest problem out there. This cult is actually doing more harm than the CC deniers. How? They're so closed-minded they don't have the ability to do creative thinking (which is needed to solve the problem). I've seen this happen over 30 years of being environmental. Honestly, I get more of a debate with the 'deniers' than the cult of CC.
Freako VEVO (28 дней назад)
How do people have the ignorance to doubt we live on a globe, are seeing climate change take place, and fall for these presidents who use lies to get their supporters amped up?!
Roy Oetting (28 дней назад)
Tyson, if you had a brain you would retire and go hide somewhere. An astrophysicist who doesn't understand solar activity and the effects it has on global temperature. How sad. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O8niiyDn2FI&t=51s
Robert Hayes (28 дней назад)
RED ALERT RED ALERT Science will not save us from Science. We need to save ourselves from GLOBAL WARMING. If the U.N. had a plan it would start something like this. 1. The world’s total population would have to accept to not bring children into this world for the next 20 years. ( there are plenty of children that need love and a home ) 2. People that would likre to end their lives should be legally and socially accepted.( euthanasia) (a persons dignified right)😀 3. All wars must stop today. ( people get to go home to live in there own places ) 4. The automobile industry must stop producing Fossil Fuel Powered social vehicles ending 2017. ( people get to still have a job in the motor industry building alternative vehicles ) 5. All countries that can ,will need to produce their own products (reducing ocean travel fuel burn)( sustain a work force) 6. All global business will need to move investment to full blown Renewable energy supply. ( they and their investors still make money ) 7. All countries will need to grow billions of tons of Indian Hemp. The hemp will provide for a huge carbon store by making everything you can from it. Replacing all petrochemical products. (diversity will create contentment and PEACE and UNDERSTANDING. ) 8. Socially all drug addicts will be supplied with there drug of choice at a place of convenience. At a cost that will cover the cost. ( social rest,the end of the black market and the decline in overall drug use and deaths.) 9. The amounts of Fossil Fuels (burnt) in the countries that will still need them will be calculated so as to keep the atmosphere stable as the gasses are reduced. ( the second and third world people will still have their first world comforts and thus we all become one world people accepting all cultures.) Sounds great hey. 10. Understanding that there is a lot more to UNDERSTAND and DO to save LIFE. The Scientific COMMUNITY have a colossal job in helping to do this. We need all of us to DO this, ALL OF US. And the list goes on. (Patience and faith in one another) Imagine the UN achieving that, when they can’t even stop the ethnic cleansing that happens daily.
Jeff Hughes (29 дней назад)
Neil is a very generous individual. He thinks this is being driven by ignorance. It is being driven by the rich because they'd rather destroy all life on Earth than not be rich and lording over someone who's poor.
Minaim Tiznot (29 дней назад)
It seems to be a waste of breath. They have no problem understandung sciences cautions. To me they're only denying them for - of course - political gain/reasons.
Henry Hill (30 дней назад)
DeGrasse if full of Shit and he knows it.. Watch "The Great Climate Swindle"...
M G in PDX (30 дней назад)
Please - Run for Office! Change the paradigm. Put scientists and teachers into office.
Walter Payton (30 дней назад)
We are a "for profit" species. We will go extinct because we couldn't "afford" to save ourselves. It would cost car companies too much to go all electric. They couldn't profit enough from solar or wind energy and then everyone would be crying about less jobs. This world revolves around money. Our world will die because those in power would lose too much money if things changed. Sad reason to die
TERM_LIMITS_NOW! (1 месяц назад)
Neil deGrasse Tyson a scientist? turned politician calling the deniers politicians. News flash: I am no politician, just a tax payer tired of being taken advantage of!
1grfield (1 месяц назад)
No one is saying that science doesn't matter.  However there is NO evidence that man is responsible for whatever is changing in the climate.  Consensus is not proof and it certainly isn't science.  Whenever these stories run, they never lead with evidence...because there is none.
adhanda2017 (1 месяц назад)
Nobel Laureate in Physics; "Global Warming is Pseudoscience" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SXxHfb66ZgM&t=3s
adhanda2017 (1 месяц назад)
This guy is as phoney as CNN.
SuperNosboy (1 месяц назад)
By that logic, when everyone believed the earth was flat....... They were right.
Pasquale Gelardi (1 месяц назад)
Consensus is not science. Abe was not alive in 1967
NovemberTheHacker (1 месяц назад)
Shut the fuck up, rapist.
Widget (1 месяц назад)
American governance that works for profit over climate protection will destroy almost everything. Human greed and the need for wealth will end humanity.
Echo Romeo (1 месяц назад)
Unfortunately the climate change myth and its long history of political bias has procured another stool pigeon in the likes of Mr.Tyson. A great video that has actual climate scientists in it from the IPCC, NASA and Professors to give you a better understanding is the link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oYhCQv5tNsQ&t=1s
Estoy Hasta LaMadre (1 месяц назад)
All pointing to the same direction? A cherry picker... calling the real scientists "cherry pickers" even Albert Einstein call his discoveries "Theories"!!! Science by definition, is NEVER SETTLED nor determined by PERCENTAGES of consensus. This aviculturist (TYSON) should be ashamed...when he knows soils and biotic flora and fauna produce 25 times more CO2 than all anthropogenic emissions combined. The false notion that humans do not absove carbon is false WE ARE CARBON, WE EAT CARBON....! Carbon makes up 18% of the human body!!! We are constatly recicling carbon! or 75'600,000 metric tones permanantly recycled. EPA document supports ~3% of atmospheric carbon dioxide is attributable to human sources Only about 3.75% [15 ppm] of the CO2 in the lower atmosphere is man-made from the burning of fossil fuels, and thus, the vast remainder of the 400 ppm atmospheric CO2 is from land-use changes and natural sources such as ocean outgassing and plant respiration.” This new work supports an old table from the Energy Information Administration which shows the same thing: only about 3% of atmospheric carbon dioxide is attributable to human sources. The numbers are from IPCC data. Land and Ocean CO2 emissions are between 90 to 152 times greater than Human CO2 emissions during the period from 1750 to 2010 https://edberry.com/blog/climate-physics/agw-hypothesis/why-our-co2-emissions-do-not-increase-atmosphere-co2/
common sense (1 месяц назад)
Whether you believe in human induced global warming or not, to anyone with a lick of common sense the benefit of cleaning up the air we breath, the water we drink and the land we live on should be a no brainer. Only the short sighted and self serving fossil fuel corporations and their right wing stooges persist in arguing for the continued rape of our environment.
Francisco Novas (1 месяц назад)
Climate change is not caused by humans if you look through out the history of the planet you can see that there’s been increases and decreases of temperature over the course of the planets history there’s no solid evidence to say that humans are the cause of climate change
tesla1961 (1 месяц назад)
4,54 no air haha
tesla1961 (1 месяц назад)
look at solar activity.
Brad Johnson (1 месяц назад)
He said 1963 he meant 1863
abinashdeepak (1 месяц назад)
Every american releases 16 times or emission compared to any other country. And yet there are 'deniers: of climate change in this shitty country. You rank 38 in education. What makes you think you are superior to scientists of your own and in evey other country ? Why do the rest of the world have to put up with these shitburgers..
BARBATUS 89 (1 месяц назад)
Neil deGrasse Tyson is a RETARD :-) youtube.com/watch?v=rW4uDrcotCQ
Sergey Akimov (1 месяц назад)
1963... Lincoln

Хотите оставить комментарий?

Присоединитесь к YouTube, или войдите, если вы уже зарегистрированы.