Videos uploaded by user “CleanTVcom”
20 Ancient Quotes Liberals STILL Don't Understand
Two thousand years ago, there may not have been liberals as we think of them today, but some of the dumb ideas that underpin the whole ideology were floating around. Fortunately, in Greece some of the greatest minds in human history were there to set people straight. There are an awful lot of liberals who could benefit from reading these more than 2,000 year-old words of wisdom. 1) "The real destroyer of the liberties of the people is he who spreads among them bounties, donations and benefits." -- Plutarch 2) "When you are offended at any man's fault, turn to yourself and study your own failings. Then you will forget your anger." -- Epictetus 3) "The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal." -- Aristotle 4) "Justice means minding one's own business and not meddling with other men's concerns." -- Plato 5) "Toil is no source of shame; idleness is shame." -- Hesiod 6) "Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws." -- Plato 7) "We hang the petty thieves and appoint the great ones to public office." -- Aesop 8) "The most virtuous are those who content themselves with being virtuous without seeking to appear so." -- Plato 9) "When there is an income tax, the just man will pay more and the unjust less on the same amount of income." -- Plato 10) "Our object in the construction of the state is the greatest happiness of the whole, and not that of any one class." -- Plato 11) "Knowledge becomes evil if the aim be not virtuous." -- Plato 12) "This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector." -- Plato 13) "Those who have virtue always in their mouths, and neglect it in practice, are like a harp, which emits a sound pleasing to others, while itself is insensible of the music." -- Diogenes 14) "We praise a man who feels angry on the right grounds and against the right persons and also in the right manner at the right moment and for the right length of time." -- Aristotle 15) "We regard wealth as something to be properly used, rather than as something to boast about. As for poverty, no one need be ashamed to admit it: the real shame is in not taking practical measures to escape from it." -- Pericles 16) "Republics decline into democracies and democracies degenerate into despotisms." -- Aristotle 17) "Only the dead have seen the end of war." -- Plato 18) "The curse of me and my nation is that we always think things can be bettered by immediate action of some sort, any sort rather than no sort." -- Plato 19) "Society is well governed when its people obey the magistrates, and the magistrates obey the law." -- Solon 20) "A system of morality which is based on relative emotional values is a mere illusion, a thoroughly vulgar conception which has nothing sound in it and nothing true." -- Socrates The preceding editorial was written by John Hawkins. More of his work may be found at: RightWingNews.com Please forward a link to this eye-opening video to others. Thank you. Put a smile on someone’s face and forward a link to this video to some friends. Thank you.
Views: 24103 CleanTVcom
Our Bank Accounts are Not Safe
Do you think your bank account deposits are safe? Don't bank on it. That's according to Lowell Ponte, former editor of Readers Digest and think tank futurist. According to Ponte, last month, Stephen Cotton walked into London-based giant HSBC to withdraw about $10,000 dollars. But the bank refused to let Mr. Cotton have money from his own account. Why? Because they said Mr. Cotton couldn't provide the bank with a satisfactory explanation for what the money was to be used for. Of course this enraged Mr. Cotton since he was asking for his own money. But Lowell Ponte said Mr. Cotton was mistaken about just whose money it was. According to new banking laws, your deposits belong to the bank. All you 'own' is a deposit receipt, or an IOU. American politicians have watched how some European countries are getting away with raiding the bank accounts of their citizens and since U.S. lawmakers are desperate for more money they are considering new ways to grab their 'fair share' of the $20 Trillion now in private U.S. retirement accounts - bringing fresh meaning to Obama's proposed "MyRA" program! Ponte says U.S. and other Western governments have agreed that future bank crises will be handled not by taxpayer bail-outs but by "bail-INS" that first seize a banks' "unsecured assets" to pay the government. Ponte said, "If the government seizes your bank's funds, you can kiss your assets goodbye." But, you may ask, "What about the FDIC? It says right on my bank window that they guarantee my money. Here's a scary fact: The FDIC has only $27 Billion, less than one percent of what might be needed to cover more than $7 Trillion of deposits that could be lost in a national financial panic and storm. Remember the recent financial panic in Cypress when depositors woke of to find their bank accounts frozen? That happened just months after the FDIC and Bank of England signed a joint document allowing government to seize customer deposits as part of a bank's property. So, what's to stop that from happening in the United States? Nothing. And it doesn't stop with banks. Cash deposits are only the beginning. IRAs and other retirement accounts are in the crosshairs for consideration as alternative sources to pay down government debt. Ponte reminds us how in 2008 Argentina replaced its citizens' cash savings with government bonds, valued at only 27% of its currency. Americans also might soon be forced to by trillions and trillion in Federal debt. All of this and more are covered in Lowell Ponte's new book, "The Great Withdrawal," which he is making available for free for the asking as a public service, courtesy of Swiss America. Please forward a link to this video to your family, friends and people you are concerned about. Ask for your free copy of "The Great Withdrawal" by calling: 800-289-2646 ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 29726 CleanTVcom
Constitutional Carry Expands to 10 States
The founding fathers of the United States of America enshrined the right to carry arms in the Second Amendment of The Bill of Rights. But over the years, liberal politicians have attempted to erode those rights. So hunters, self-defense advocates and pro-gun organizations, including Gun Owners of America, have worked with legislators to adopt Constitutional Carry laws. Recently West Virginia and Idaho added their states to the Constitutional Carry Club, bringing the total to 10 states. West Virginia was a tough fight. Their governor vetoed the permitless carry bill sponsored by 19-year-old Delegate Saira Blair and backed by Gun Owners of America. But after much debate, West Virginia legislators carried the day, overrode their governor's veto, and the people rejoiced. And in Idaho, there also was a big fight on the issue of whether or not people should be allowed to defend themselves, their families, and the community at large. And of all the crazy things, New York's Michael Bloomberg decided to impose his morality, or lack thereof, on the citizens of Idaho, in an all out advertising blitz to get Idahoans to call their governor to oppose the constitutional right of their citizens to carry a concealed weapon. Initially it appeared that there was a 5 to 1 ration of calls opposing Constitutional Carry, but then it was discovered that most of those calls were coming from out of state with Bloomberg's finger prints all over them. So Gun Owners of America responded by joining the Idaho Second Amendment Alliance in encouraging phone calls to the Idaho Governor Butch Otter's office. And soon the calling ratio became evenly split between those who support the Second Amendment and others who favor something resembling more of a Socialist, big government state. Gun Owners of America would like to thank The Idaho Second Amendment Alliance and all of the other grassroots supporters of Constitutional Carry, as well as a special thanks to one dynamic young lady by the name of Saira Blair, a political conservative who doesn't want her gun rights or those of her fellow citizens taken away. People laughed when at 18 years old Saira dared to run for office, believing one person could make a difference. She did most of her campaigning from her college dorm room. But in the end they stopped laughing when she more than doubled the votes of her older Democrat opponent 63% to 30%. For more information on your Second Amendment rights including action alerts, visit the Gun Owners of America web site at: http://www.GunOwners.org
Views: 5033 CleanTVcom
Garrett McNamara breaks world record surfing 100 foot wave!
Visit the DREAMER MOVIE site: http://tinyurl.com/dreamer2013 Garrett McNamara broke the world record surfing 100 foot wave! This astounding accomplisment occurred in Portugal on January 28, 2013. But what makes this so remarkable is that he broke his own record in the same location he set the current record off the coast of Nazaré, Portugal in an underwater canyon, about 1,000 ft deep, running from the ocean into a funnel that leads straight to the cliffs. This video first shows Garrett's first world record wave from about a year ago, and then it shows his new world record wave of about 100 feet that he just surfed. They are shown adjacent to each other so you can judge for yourself if he broke his own world record. Visit the DREAMER MOVIE site: http://tinyurl.com/dreamer2013 Enjoy watching any of hundreds of more videos at http://www.CleanTV.com ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 392339 CleanTVcom
Here is why the establishment elite of Washington hate Donald Trump so badly. It really is this simple. The Muslim world is largely divided between its two largest camps of distinction; Sunni and Shia. The divide between Sunnis and Shia is the largest and oldest in the history of Islam. Both groups are card-carrying Muslims, hardcore Islamists, that are looking for the Middle East (and world) to one day be dominated by Islam and Sharia. While they most certainly have a few "doctrine" and ideological differences, their biggest beef with each other is determining which of the two main groups will get to be in charge of the new Islamic world they wish to create. And so, they constantly fight and kill each other. However, if an infidel shows up in their midst - one is who not "one of them" - they will join forces to fight that outsider to the death. Why? Because there would then be an outside possibility that the infidel would defeat them and then neither of the two groups would get to "run the kingdom." Now let's talk about establishment Republicans and Democrats. They undoubtedly have ideological and "doctrine" differences. But they ultimately want the very same end goal. They are each looking to build a "new world order." Representatives from both groups routinely use that "globalist" terminology for their dreams of their "kingdom on earth." One used to be considered a "conspiracy theorist" if you pointed out this fact - but no longer. The elitist spokespeople (from the Bush family to John Kerry and everyone in between) constantly use the terms. They have spilled the beans. They are basically two sides of the same coin. They both hold to the same "religion." So what are they fighting about in Washington? It is what they have always fought about - who gets to run the show! They will fight each other, impeach each other, threaten each other, attempt to outmaneuver each other, lie to each other, and cheat each other - until ... an outsider comes along and threatens to wipe the whole slate clean and perhaps turn it all back over to We The People. That prospect is unthinkable to them. It would snatch their dreams, wealth, and power right out from underneath them. In order to prevent that from happening, they will hold their noses, compromise, and strike deals to let the "other side" have the "power" for a while until they can regroup and try to retake their "territory." Into the room steps Donald Trump. The man that Newt Gingrich said, "Couldn't be controlled or manipulated. He's an outsider. He doesn't belong to the secret societies.” Watch and listen to Gingrich's comments here: (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dO-NA73FsW8)" The bottom line is that Trump scares the elitists to death. He gives the establishment crowd sheer nightmares. He's not one of them. He's an infidel. He has the potential to be the “exterminator.” He has a different worldview. He is much more of a nationalist. They are globalists. He probably can't be bribed - he's already richer than all of them combined. He most likely can't be manipulated, blackmailed, or controlled - if he doesn't allow himself to be. Listen to what Donald Trump is promising and remember - THIS is what the Washington insiders hate him for: Protect our borders - build a wall if necessary Stop illegal immigration and refugees Stop Islamists who wish to destroy us from entering our country Restore America's military might and greatness Restore America's economic engine of greatness Return America's Corporations back to the mainland Create new, good, high-paying jobs Get people off welfare and into a viable job market Respect our constitution, heritage, and Judeo-Christian heritage Deal firmly with those who hate us - not genuflecting and cowering to them (probably won't kiss the Saudi King's ring) And for this - the establishment hates him. Some of them are even saying "I will vote for Hillary before Donald Trump!" Really? Yes! Of course they would. They must! And now you know why. Here is who hates Trump: The Washington elite and establishment shills The liberal media The socialists The communists The entitlement mentality crowd The racist Black Lives Matters - type groups Islamists ISIS Globalists The Chinese The Russians The anti-Israel nations and groups Those who hate Christians Those who hate America Those who hate the Constitution Those who want America's borders open to the world Now you know at least a part of what's really going on in Washington these days. …This videtorial was written and narrated by Carl Gallups. Used with permission. (c) 2016 CleanTV
Views: 108041 CleanTVcom
Michigan State Professor 1, Muslim Students 0
The score stands at: Michigan State 1, and the Muslim Students Association zero. Three cheers for Michigan State Professor Indrek Wichman who emailed the Muslim Student's Association in response to their protest of Danish cartoons portraying the Prophet Muhammad as a terrorist bomber. The student association claimed the cartoons were "hate speech" and they wanted their university to brand it as such and to do something about it. Well, Professor Wichman did just that. In his e-mail, here's why he said: Dear Moslem Association: As a professor of Mechanical Engineering here at MSU I intend to protest your protest. I am offended not by cartoons, but by more mundane things like beheadings of civilians, cowardly attacks on public buildings, suicide murders, murders of Catholic priests (the latest in Turkey!), burnings of Christian churches, the continued persecution of Coptic Christians in Egypt, the imposition of Sharia law on non-Muslims, the rapes of Scandinavian girls and women (called "whores" in your culture), the murder of film directors in Holland, and the rioting and looting in Paris France. This is what offends me, a soft-spoken person and academic, and many, many, many of my colleagues. I counsel you dissatisfied, aggressive, brutal, and uncivilized slave-trading Moslems to be very aware of this as you proceeded with your infantile "protests." If you do not like the values of the West — see the 1st Amendment — you are free to leave. I hope for God's sake that most of you choose that option. Please return to your ancestral homelands and build them up yourselves instead of troubling Americans. Cordially, I. S. Wichman, Professor of Mechanical Engineering Professor Indrek Wichman exercising his speech--It's about time someone said it as it is without cowering in fear over political correctness. As for the Muslim student association, as you might suspect, they weren't very happy with Professor Wichman's response. They demanded he be reprimanded and be forced to attend diversity sensitivity training. And not to be outdone, the Michigan chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations with their usual double standard demand that only the Prophet Muhammad is allowed free speech in calling for murder of non-Muslims with no free speech afforded to infidels other than their right to open their mouths for one final scream as Muslims chop off their heads. And what was the response of the university for Professor Wichmann standing his ground? Remarkably, they defended Professor Wichmann's right of free speech, saying it was a private email and they don't intend to publicly condemn Professor Wichmann's remarks! Please forward a copy of this email to others to help them to garner the courage to speak out against the growing worldwide Muslim murders of innocent people who they have the audacity to call infidels. By definition an infidel means a nonbeliever and I don't believe in murdering innocent people. Won't you join me? Say it loud. Say it proud. I'm proud to be an infidel! And anyone who is uncomfortable living in a country of infidels, they are welcome to leave it. NOTE: You may verify the validly of this video at Snopes at: http://www.snopes.com/politics/soapbox/wichman.asp ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 7223 CleanTVcom
US Leaders Blackmailed? Obama Classmate Tells All!
Obama's former college class mate Wayne Allyn Root explains how after Obama was so thoroughly repudiated by voters last election in the form of voting Republicans in and Democrats out, Republicans have mysteriously failed to push through any noteworthy legislation and Obama, who is supposed to be a lame duck, gets much of his liberal agenda to pass by either vote or Executive Actions with virtually no Republican opposition. Why? Blackmail and bribery, Wayne Allyn Root opines. More videos by Wayne Allyn Root on the personalliberty YouTube channel. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 12796 CleanTVcom
Hillary All Time Biggest 22 Scandals
Presenting the biggest 22 scandals of Hillary Rodham Clinton packed into a video of just under one hour. Had time permitted we could have filled a 10 hour video! Visit our website: http://clean.tv
Views: 34500 CleanTVcom
10 Million Kenyans Reject Obama's Gay Agenda
The following is an article written by former Islamic Terrorist, Walid Shoebat: When Obama lectured Kenya comparing gays to the mistreatment of African Americans, Africa responded with a scathing letter written by 700 Kenyan evangelical pastors on behalf of their 10 million Christian followers. In it, Africa told Obama to take his ‘disgusting agenda’, his ‘equating racism with rejection of homosexuality’, and told him to shove it. The message from Africans to this African American Obama, was “hit the road Jack” while adding “don’t you come back no more”. “We do not want him to come and talk on homosexuality in Kenya or push us to accepting that which is against our faith and culture,” the letter read. Specifically, the letter asked that Obama leave “the gay talk” in America and focus his discussions in Kenya on “development,” “cooperation” and “the long-time relationship Kenya has had with America.” “But about our beliefs and culture — keep off!” the letter added. According to Bishop Mark Kariuki, who led the alliance against Obama, the Christians in Kenya did not appreciate the way the president had “used previous trips to Africa to urge governments to respect gay rights.” The letter was therefore meant to serve as a warning to Obama. Kariuki gets it. “The family is the strength of a nation,” Kariuki explained. “If the family is destroyed, then the nation is destroyed. So we don’t want to open doors for our nation to be destroyed!” Even the President of Kenya, delivered the same “hit the road Jack” message to Obama. “We need to speak frankly about these things” says President Kenyatta in response to Obama’s statement that Kenya must share the same values as the United States on gay rights issues. Kenyatta, at the press conference in Kenya, snubbed Obama and continued showing zero tolerate to Obama’s belaboring trying to impose the idea that a man taking it from behind was all “normal”. He quickly slapped down Obama’s suggestion to impose his evil agenda on the African country saying “there are some things we do not share”. The ‘gay rights’ Kenyatta insisted “our culture and our society do not accept”. “its very difficult for us to impose on people that [homosexuality]”. ...Be part of the greatest rescue mission in history, rescuing Christians in the Middle East from imminent abuse and slaughter. Visit: http://RescueChristians.org
Views: 10220 CleanTVcom
Obama Wants UN Noose Around Necks of Gun Owners
Right now White House officials are booking flights to Mexico... ... and they’re not bringing back souvenirs. They’re on their way to the United Nations Small Arms Conference, scheduled in Mexico City on August 24, 2015. And they’re planning to bring back the framework for a global gun control regime. It’s important that you contact your Senators right now and tell them to vote NO on any agreement reached at the Mexico UN conference. Obama has already signed the UN Small Arms Treaty and it is waiting ratification by the Senate. Obama’s global gun grabbers are jetting down to Mexico to iron out the details of this tyrannical new regime. It requires signing nations to "establish and maintain a national control system, including a national control list." That means not just NATIONAL gun registration. You will be entered into a GLOBAL gun registration database. Over the past century, we have seen registration lists used as a prelude to gun confiscation in countries like Rwanda, Cambodia and many more. Gun confiscation, in turn, led to horrific genocides in many of these countries -- including Rwanda and Cambodia. Imagine dictators around the world who can control the UN blue helmets and the UN military force that have your name on record as being a gun owner. It’s preposterous! And this is why the Senate MUST kill this toxic agreement. Please take action to defend your gun rights. Contact your senators right now. Tell them to vote NO on any agreement reached at the Mexico UN conference. You may also want to use the pre-written letter in the description area of this video. Thank you. For further information on guns and the right to bear arms, visit the web site of Gun Owners of America at: GunOwners.org
Views: 4873 CleanTVcom
Hard lesson in Socialist schemes
It was the last day of college registration and students were scrambling to pick their final courses for the semester. Without having ample time to sufficiently vet their potential professors, the desperate students were signing up blindly for just about any course that would fulfill their graduation requirements. As a result of their indiscriminate haste, about 300 students in this liberal university found themselves in the lecture hall of the one lone conservative professor on campus. But before the political science professor could open his mouth during the early morning class, one of the sleepy looking co-eds raised his hand and asked, "How hard is it to get a passing grade in your class?" The professor was take back a bit and though pensively before answering, saying, "You know, I have never failed a single student before--but one year I failed an entire class." His comment drew a few nervous chuckles from the ocean of bleary-eyed progressives. But when his tone grew more somber, hundreds of heads inched forward to see if this class might be more than they bargained for. He said, "The entire class I failed four years ago had insisted that Obama's socialist schemes worked well with no one being poor and no one being rich in a great leap forward for equalization. How many of you would agree with your comrades in that class that proceeded you?" Feeling a bit baited, initially not one hand raised. But after an awkward minute of timidity, first one, then two and eventually every hand was raised in student solidarity." The conservative professor, outnumbered and looking mildly tortured, said: "You win. I will conduct yet a second experiment with this class on efficacy of Obama's schemes. All grades would be averaged and everyone will receive the same grade so that no one will fail and no one would receive an A." With that, spontaneous cheers and applause erupted from about 80% of the college students, high fiving each other, exiting their first day of class with that antiquated old conservative professor. One week later after their first test, the conservative political science professor announced that in the spirit of Obama, he averaged all of the students' grades resulting in everyone getting a B. Of course, the students who studied hard were upset and the students who didn't studied little were happy. Another week later as the second test rolled around, the students who previously studied only a little, had studied even less this time around, and the ones who studied hard decided they wanted would take a free ride too so even they studied little. The result? The second test average was a D! And no one was happy. Then the day for midterm exams arrived, after it was too late to drop the course, the test was administered. And the average score of that test was an F. The results of all tests thereafter, including the final exam, were collective failing marks. Blame shifting and name calling escalated with hard feelings abounding since no one was willing to study for the benefit of anyone else. On the last day of class, the professor announced that everyone in the class had failed, but as his formerly liberal students were making their way to the for the door with their heads hung low, he gave one final lecture his students would never forget: "Just as all of you failed this class while waiting for others to do the work, so will Obama's Socialist schemes ultimately fail because when the reward is great, the effort to succeed is great, but when government takes all the reward away, no one will try--or even want to succeed." ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 10292 CleanTVcom
We Really Are Living in the Matrix, a Biblical Hologram
Everyone knows what a hologram is, but have you ever considered that we actually live in one? That was the premise behind the movie, “The Matrix” but it seems the film was closer to reality than we ever imagined. Scientists are finding that we do indeed live in a digital simulation. A few remarkable discoveries pointed toward this conclusion and led scientist David Bohm to state, “that despite its apparent solidity the universe is at heart a phantasm, a gigantic and splendidly detailed hologram.” The physics concept that gravity results from “thin, vibrating strings” existing in nine dimensions of space and one of time, is another indication. Recently, a Japanese math team provided, “compelling evidence” and now scientists have begun experiments to verify it in physical, rather than just mathematical terms. Physicist James Gates states that, in mathematically trying to understand nature through string theory, what we find written into the fabric of the cosmos are error-correcting computer codes. These cannot have arisen from random chance; they’re evidence of a studied, refined design. The virtual reality for people in “The Matrix” was created by computers. Those watching what happened to others inside that hologram viewed a screen with a series of numbers. Gates basically is describing such a picture when he speaks of computer codes being written into the universe and forming nature itself. This confirms what Christians always have believed: a simulation must have a Designer and Creator. It reinforces the idea that this world is simply a testing ground for the real, eternal world. And it clarifies the biblical claim that God spoke our world into existence. That’s easily understandable when we recognize it’s a mere projection. It also demonstrates the foolishness of Darwinism; evolution as the creative force behind life is both impossible and nonsensical in a digital simulation. But grasping this truth requires stepping outside the box of ‘reality’ as we’ve always understood it and looking at life on a deeper level - on a spiritual, supernatural level. If you’d like to know more, go to usaprophecy.com and click on the 666 blog to read, “Are We Really in the Matrix?” ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 5761 CleanTVcom
Calling Evil Good and Good Evil: END TIMES are here!
2500 years ago the prophet Isaiah issued this warning in the ancient scroll bearing his name in chapter 5, verse 20: "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" Ancient scriptures are too numerous to list that talk about horrendous judgment against people and nations who don't heed this warning and others like it. So let's see just how close our modern culture is to completely thumbing their nose at our Creator and His warnings to us. Modern culture portrays being a pure virgin woman as bad but dressing and acting slutty is good. Marriage solely between man and woman is now called bad but homosexual same sex marriage is called good. Killing animals is called evil but murdering innocent pre-born children in their mother's wombs through abortion is called good. Being too lazy to work is called good and rewarded with welfare but working hard enough to be rich is called bad and bad rich people must be taxed to give their money to people who don't work. This is opposite of scriptural teaching that if a man doesn't work, he doesn't eat. And this is just scratching the surface. So with America embracing evil and shunning good, is it any wonder we have so many problems today? How could we have so quickly changed from a nation embracing morality to a country literally begging to be destroyed? Isaiah's warning bears repeating: "Woe unto them that call evil good, and good evil; that put darkness for light, and light for darkness; that put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter!" If you want to see American reverse course and head toward moral sanity, please forward a link of this video to others. Thank you. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 5124 CleanTVcom
Trump: We need Christian Immigration before More Beheadings
Donald Trump wants more Christian Immigration. He asks this rhetorical question: "They're being beheaded and they can't come in?" Donald Trump, married three times, the ruthless business titan in reality TV shows, might not appear to be the knight in shining armor that attracts Christian voters in the crowded 2016 Republican primary. Not at first glance, at least. But is there something in those steely blue eyes and mop of blond hair, with all his worldly success at making money, that could make him the warrior of the right? Trump started rising in the polls after making the comment that Mexico is “not sending their best” to America and that among those coming in illegally are a high percentage of rapists, murderers and other violent felons. But that’s not all Trump is saying. He’s also speaking up for Syria’s persecuted Christians. Though you won’t read about it in the establishment media, Trump has been making repeated comments about persecuted Christians in Syria and the difficulty they’ve had in coming to the West as refugees or asylum seekers. At a speech in Las Vegas last weekend, Trump said those persecuted for their Christian faith by Muslims in Syria ought to be brought to America. And, if he were president, he’d make sure they get a one-way ticket to that safe haven. Trump said, “If you’re from Syria and you’re a Christian, you cannot come into this country. And they’re the ones that are being persecuted. If you’re Islamic and you come in, hard to believe, you can come in so easily. In fact, it’s one of our main groups of people that are coming in. Not that we should discriminate against one or the other. But if you’re Christian, you cannot get into the country. You cannot get in. I thought that was unbelievable. We have to do something about it.” Trump, proud of his Christian heritage, said, "You know a lot of people don’t know I’m Protestant. Nobody believes me. I’m Presbyterian, can you believe this? Presbyterian. We have to protect our people. They’re being beheaded." The preceding was excerpted with permission from an article published in WND.com
Views: 1992 CleanTVcom
It is Now Against the Law to ALMOST Break the Law!
How much cash can you now withdraw from your bank and carry in America without risk of being arrested, or of having your assets seized? The ominous answer is that carrying even one dollar in cash might give the government a pretext for such actions. Once upon a time, this question usually mattered only at the border. People were required to declare if they were carrying more than $10,000 in cash or negotiable instruments when entering or leaving the United States. Failure to make a truthful declaration to U.S. Customs can result in the forfeiture of the money a person is carrying. Today, because of anti-racketeering RICO statutes and the 2001 Patriot Act, your bank is required to notify the Federal Government if you deposit or withdraw $10,000 or more in cash. In effect, your bank is required to spy on your financial life in this way for the government. Former Republican Speaker of the House of Representatives Dennis Hastert was surprised when his bank asked him to explain why he had made several $50,000 withdrawals. It used to be that what you did with your money was not the bank’s business. Hastert, ironically, helped pass the Patriot Act and should have been aware of this trap he helped make into a law that can now ensnare millions of us. After being questioned by his bank – the kind of event described in detail in the Introduction of the eye-opening book, "Don’t Bank On It! The Unsafe World of 21st Century Banking," Hastert reportedly then began making smaller withdrawals, at least 106 of which were for cash amounts of less than $10,000." The original $10,000 reporting limit on your bank has not changed since 1970, writes New York Times financial reporter Josh Barro, even though inflation since then has reduced the purchasing power of today’s $10,000 to the purchasing power of a mere $1,640 in 1970 dollars. Hastert apparently did not know that the government has also created an almost Orwellian crime called “structuring” that allows the arrest or asset seizure of those who deliberately deposit or withdraw less than $10,000 with the “intent” of evading this reporting limit. So it is now against the law to “almost” break the law. What’s next The IRS penalizing you for “structuring” your spending to evade taxes by giving enough to charity to fall into a lower tax bracket? This video was brought to you as a public service from Swiss America and its chairman, Craig R. Smith who is offering his book, "Don’t Bank On It!," free of charge, just for the asking. Simply click on the tag on your video screen to get your free copy of this engaging book that shows 20 major risks your bank account faces, as well as a variety of better, more secure ways to protect your assets. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 5556 CleanTVcom
Obama Wealth Redistribution Questioned by 5-year-old
Obama's Redistribution of Wealth was questioned 5-year-old political commentator, Melody. She uses the example of working to earn her allowance and to save up enough money to buy some ice cream. The before she gets to eat it, Obama forces her to give it to someone else. She opines that it's her choice who to give ice cream to, if anyone at all. Melody also questioned why Obama would reward Iran by giving them over $100 billion in assets back, enough to build hundreds of nuclear bombs. Visit Melody's talk show site, "A Moment with Melody," at: https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLFWv7TixAilj4OUlOqACHH6cpxEAi7Ko0
Views: 49889 CleanTVcom
U.S. Government PATENTED Ebola! Why?
Who has the most to gain by a worldwide outbreak of Ebola? Whoever can sell a solution to the problem, right? And just who that might be? Global pharmaceutical companies to the rescue! Who else might be interested in being perceived as a hero sent to rescue millions of damsels and dudes in distress? Big Government is here to protect you! And control you because with protection comes control. So, here we have two huge entities supposedly here helping us from outside invaders, albeit the tiniest of enemies being single cell viruses, but just how outside are they? What if I were to tell you that one of those big ‘helper’ entities actually had a patent on Ebola? Sound farfetched? One guess which of the two big happy helpers it is, drug companies, right? …Wrong. It’s big government. Specifically The United States of America. Before you dismiss this is far-fetched or even impossible, just run a simple free patent search under the keyword Ebola. Not only will you see that Uncle Sam owns the patent on Ebola but they also own the rights to all variations on Ebola, with the rights to all Ebola research. The official owner of this Ebola patent is: The Government of the US as Represented by the Secretary of the Dept. of Health. Essentially it is a patent issued by The United States government to The United States government. Please, put this video on pause and look up U.S. patent number 20120251502 and then listen to the rest of this video—if you dare. The link to the U.S. patent on Ebola is: http://www.google.com/patents/US20120251502 and you may copy and paste it into your browser from the description area for this video. ...Now you know what very few people know that Ebola is not only able to be patented but that patent is owned by the U.S. government! So ask yourself one question: What word is synonymous with patentable creations or inventions? …You guessed it: Inventors. So is it possible that Ebola was actually invented? Regardless of whether or not the original Ebola virus was a government invented germ biological warfare agent or whether the current Ebola virus is variation of the original virus, one thing is for sure: this current strain of Ebola appears to have the potential of killing millions—if not billions—of people. So if and when the dynamic duo of big government and big pharma announce that they have a vaccine or antidote to Ebola, should we trust them enough to let them inject their liquid solution into our tender trusting arms? Never mind the fact that even the Center for Disease Control admitted that they had 10 to 30 million polio vaccines that they said may have been contaminated with SV-40 polyomavirus, a major suspected cancer agent. What is the choice we are given? Ebola or a big government, big pharma vaccine? Talk about being stuck between a rock and a hard place. More like being stuck with a sharp prick. Of course, a likely scenario will be government announcing they are approving a fast-tracked vaccine by some pharmaceutical company that got a special government waiver from all liability since the wonder drug company worked day and night to come up with a solution to a global pandemic. And we certainly wouldn’t want to leave big pharma liable for hurting us in any way or allowing other time released scourges embedded within the solution. Ah, it never ends, does it? Prior to the era of modern medicine, only about 2% of the general population ever got cancer. Today about one in three people get cancer in their lifetimes. It took cancer many years to manifest from such things as polio vaccines but what a cash cow cancer has become. Each cancer case has the potential of over one hundred thousand dollars in revenue for the medical and pharmaceutical industry with their three barbaric treatments of choice: Cutting, burning and poisoning, each of which leads to a myriad of other treatments to cure us from their cures. So, a fair question might be: If we take the big government, big pharma solution, what future time-released ailments might we receive and what further treatments might we need to treat us from those treatments? Like it or not, humanity today is faced with a strain of Ebola that carries a reported mortality rate of 80% to 90%. Soon we likely will be faced with options, to accept or reject an injection of a soon-to-be-released untested ‘solution.' The choice is yours—oh, unless they make it mandatory. To be continued… ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 18263 CleanTVcom
How to be Truly Great
In this inspirational video, Dr. Kevin Elko shares principles on how to be truly great, not in terms of mere money or prestige but in terms of the true measures of success. Dr. Kevin Elko is a nationally renowned performance consultant, professional motivational speaker, and author, who has consulted with dozens of collegiate and professional teams. His presentations and personal consultations have had a major impact on the performance objectives of these teams and individual players. His appeal in the sports world translates directly to the corporate arena. Dr. Elko has consulted with and presented to hundreds of companies, including Travelers Insurance Company, Prudential Securities, Smith Barney, Merrill Lynch, and Tyson Foods. Watch and see how Kevin draws out the very best from you! ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 25716 CleanTVcom
30 MILLION Polio Vaccines w Cancer Contamination per CDC
Recently the Center for Disease Control, otherwise known as the CDC, removed a web page that admitted opening that more than 98 million Americans received polio vaccines during an 8-year a time span when part of those vaccines were contaminated with polyomavirus SV40, believed to cause cancer. But the CDC's own estimates there were between 10 and 30 MILLION Americans who could have received contaminated doses of vaccines laced with SV40. According to Loyola University assistant professor of Pathology Michele Carbone, the SV-40 virus has reared its ugly head in cases of mesothelioma cancer, as well as in osteosarcoma bone cancer. Dr. Carbone has also said that HIV/AIDS was spread by way of hepatitis B vaccinations manufactured by Merck and Company in the 1970s, leading to the first outbreaks of in the 70s. So while modern medicine was winning the war against the debilitating polio disease, it was planting seeds--or injecting seeds-- of cancer which today has become an epidemic. Wow! Just picture a hypodermic needle going into your arm or into the arm of your small child. What's in those things? Do we really trust them? Are they safe and effective? While there is a lot of fine print of pharmaceutical packaging of today's modern drugs and vaccines being injected into millions of tender arms, there is no warning that some of they may contain cancer or organisms believed to be cancer causing. But you might say, polio has been wiped off the face of the earth. Why even bother take polio vaccines anymore. Well, apart from the argument of whether anyone should or should not take any vaccines, there is also a very disturbing breaking news story about Pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline 'accidentally' releasing over 10 gallons of concentrated live polio into a water treatment plant in Belgium in early September 2014. See the link to that news release in this video description section, as well as the link to the original CDC cancer admission. Only time will tell if polio makes a comeback from this 'accidental' spillage. Ah, but if it does, at least we have our friends at big bucks, big pharma to 'protect' us from such things as polio--that is if we can get a safe and effective vaccine that is not tainted with other agents that might require yet further vaccines in the future to protect us from them and possibly from the other dangerous organisms that might 'accidentally' get mixed in with the helper vaccines. Not to be unduly cynical but in a normal crime, police investigators look for three things: Means, motive and opportunity. As unthinkable as it is to grasp the genocidal consequences of this but think like a detective for a moment. Do pharmaceutical companies have the MEANS to dump polio into water or to put cancer-causing agents into vaccines? Do they have a MOTIVE? Are they in business merely to help people or also make a profit? And finally, do they have the OPPORTUNITY or did they have an alibi for not being at the scene of the crime. And even if the top level brass at pharmaceutical companies were not personally dumping live polio strains into water supplies or personally injecting toxins or pathogens into each vial of injectable substances, there has to be some accountability in this whole pharmacological mess. Please forward a copy of this email to any Congressman you know who has not accepted campaign contributions from Big Pharma. Uh, come to think of it, that might be none. Link to news release about the polio spill in Belgium: http://www.health.belgium.be/eportal/19098116_FR#.VCXWYHl0wSv Link to the CDC cancer admission: http://truthstreammedia.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/polocancer.jpg ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 1681 CleanTVcom
Anne of Green Gables Star Dead, Jonathan Crombie RIP
Remember Gilbert Blythe from Anne of Green Gables? Jonathan Crombie, who played that iconic role so well, has passed away at the tender young age of 48. Cause of death was reportedly a brain hemorrhage, for the actor born and raised in Toronto, Canada, who starred in the Canadian Broadcasting Company's favorite coming of age drama. Playing the role of the ever patient suitor in pursuit of Anne Shirley, played by Megan Follows, proved to be art imitating life as those who knew Jonathan Crombie described him to be very much the nice guy he played in Anne of Green Gables. Friends said he had a sense of humor and was genuinely fun to be around. Jonathan Crombie, beloved Gilbert to Anne and to us, we remember you well and our prayers go out to your family, who raised you well. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 16008 CleanTVcom
Did DOJ Strong Cities Put US Under Islamic Law?
On September 30, 2015 at the UN, Attorney General Loretta Lynch announced a new worldwide law enforcement initiative, the Strong Cities Network, to be set up in certain American cities. What this actually is, is the UN plan for global police, using the Department of Justice. It’s the overriding of American law by the Obama administration in conjunction with the UN, without Congressional input. What’s the initiative all about? Officially it’s to prevent and combat “violent extremism in all of its forms” without linking it “with any particular religion, nationality or ethnic group.” The emphasis is on inclusiveness, collaboration, and non-discrimination. Although it doesn’t mention any specific religion, using the language of Obama-speak, its goal of “building social cohesion and resilience to violent extremism” actually means peacekeeping between Muslims and non-Muslims, “mostly by making sure that non-Muslims don’t complain too loudly about, much less work against, rapidly expanding Muslim populations and the Islamization of their communities,” according to Pamela Geller. This is a reasonable interpretation. Instead of “building social cohesion” the flood of Islamic refugees and immigrants are destroying social unity in Western nations, yet they’re being welcomed by governments despite public outcry. And the FBI recently sent out a bulletin to law enforcement warning of attacks against Muslims by “militia extremists” even though there’s no proof of any imminent attacks. In DHS reports, we’ve also seen the Obama administration target conservatives such as Christians, gun-owners and pro-lifers as dangerous. Who’s set to head this “worldwide initiative?” A Jordanian Muslim, Prince Zeid Ra’ad al-Hussein, the UN’s new High Commissioner of Human Rights, of course. The UN is a sharia-compliant organization and there’s been a great deal of movement toward silencing critics of Islam in nations around the world, fueling speculation that this will be used to enforce Islamic blasphemy laws. According to Foreign Policy, “in 2013, the ministers of justice of the League of Arab States approved an extremely wide-ranging draft blasphemy law that not only aims at criminalizing allegedly blasphemous utterances…but also envisaged extraterritorial jurisdiction, meaning that someone deemed to have blasphemed in the United States or Europe would be liable to prosecution in Arab League member states.” The SCN’s stated aim is to “connect cities and other local authorities on an international basis, to enhance local level approaches” by “facilitating information sharing” and creating “new and innovative local practices.” The practical effect is to strip authority from local law enforcement as it destroys American sovereignty. Initially 23 cities will be involved. Constitutional lawyer John Whitehead states that this is an initial step toward a global police force, which is being imposed on us whether we want it or not. This is the continual non-stop merging of information on every level heading toward what John McTernan refers to as the 666 Surveillance System. He also feels that as America rejects God and Obama turns from Israel, God is sending Islam as a judgment on the nation. For more information, go to facebook.com/JohnMcTernansInsights
Views: 3780 CleanTVcom
Japanese WWII soldier hid in jungle until 1974 dies in 2014
Remember that Japanese soldier who was fighting in World War II but didn't know the war was over and hid in the jungle until 1974? Could you imagine, Hiroo Onoda, a 21 year old soldier trained in guerilla warfare, spending 30 years hiding in the jungle on Lubang Island in the Philippines? Until age 51? During that time many people tried to find Hiroo who ignored the leaflets announcing the end of the war. He brushed those off as an enemy disinformation campaign. It was only after his old commanding officer sought him out and rescinded his prior orders to never surrender that got him to come out of hiding. When he finally arrived back home in Japan, he was asked in a news conference what he had thought about for those 30 long years. He simply said, "Carrying out my orders." He went on to live in a very changed Japan that grew from a war-ravage nation into an international economic powerhouse, doing business with his former enemy, the United States of America. 40 years has passed since he Hiroo Onoda left the jungle and in January of 2014, he has left the earth, at the ripe old age of 91. We will remember Hiroo Onoda as a man of great national allegiance and perseverance. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 5159 CleanTVcom
"Petrus Romanus" Reviewed
Enjoy watching any of hundreds more videos at: http://www.CleanTV.com Most of us have probably given little thought to who is going to be the last pope. The question isn't even on the radar. What is in view is all the fuss about the Mayan calendar ending in December 2012. We may not believe it, but we've heard about it. Tom Horn and Chris Putnam hope to turn this around with Petrus Romanus: The Final Pope is Here. Tom Horn calls Petrus Romanus his most important research yet. "When Chris Putnam and I were doing the research, there were two or three times when we stopped in our tracks. Stuff started falling in our laps from dusty corridors inside universities, lost books, all the way to Dane County, Wisconsin and the murder of Edward Kuntz." But unlike a well-known religious broadcaster who incorrectly predicted the Rapture multiple times, Horn and Putnam do not claim to be prophets. Their role was to examine evidence from what church scholars have been saying throughout the ages. They ultimately admit that God has the final say on dates, not Christian writers or even more sinister sources.   One of their unique contributions is their rediscovery of the Prophecy of the Popes. Most Catholics have scant knowledge of the subject. Protestants have generally never heard of it. The list of 112 pontiffs with short descriptions seems to have originated in 1139 with a vision experienced by Saint Malachy, an Irish bishop. To cut to the chase, the current pope, Benedict XVI, is number 111 on the list. Rome is supposedly destroyed during the reign of his successor, nicknamed Petrus Romanus or Peter the Roman. So where did the year 2012 enter the picture? Co-author Chris Putnam credits the writings of a Belgian Jesuit named Rene Thibaut as a major inspiration. "He found the year 2012 as the final year of the Pope in more than one calculation, like five or six different anagrams and encryption codes in the Latin text of the prophecy." Much of Horn and Putnam's book references sources outside the evangelical worldview. They defend the approach by reminding readers that not everyone in the Bible who had a prophetic experience had a solid relationship with God. Take Nebuchadnezzar and his dream, for example. Another unique contribution of the writing pair is linking Petrus Romanus to the False Prophet of Revelation. From the time of the Reformation onward, for several centuries, Protestant writers almost unanimously identified the papal office as Anti-Christ. Then the subject somehow became unpopular and is seldom mentioned anymore. Horn and Putnam explain why they believe the False Prophet is a better fit for the final pope. The book successfully surveys Catholic misgivings about the state of the Roman Church — from Traditionalists who are still perplexed about Vatican II to those who believe the full text of the Third Secret of Fatima has never been fully revealed. The authors examine Jesuit Malachi Martin's assertion that pedophilic Satanism at the heart of the Vatican throughout the College of Cardinals is linked to the "enthronement of the fallen Archangel Lucifer" in the Roman Catholic Citadel on June 29, 1963. Tom Horn and Chris Putnam make a good writing team. Horn is a consummate storyteller and Putnam an equally consummate scholar. Together, they've produced a book that can be easily understood by laymen, with a lot of extras for those who appreciate good documentation. Enjoy watching any of hundreds more videos at: http://www.CleanTV.com ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 6448 CleanTVcom
Social Security: Which Political Party Drained it Dry?
We're told Republicans wants to do away with Social Security but is that true? This video shows which political party consistently drained Social Security dry--and it wasn't the Republican Party. NOTE: Less than one day after we posted this video, we received an admonishment for allegedly advancing 'urban myths' about Social Security. We were giving the following links that supposedly debunk our video: http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/InternetMyths.html http://www.socialsecurity.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html But from what we could tell, only item #3 seems to be 100% true.The other line items seem to be spin to defuse some of the punch of this video. So we added a note at the part of the video that claims Social Security payments were originally tax deductible. Our apology for our error in this one area but we are letting the video stand, and encouraging viewers to visit the link from Social Security Administration attempting to discredit the points made in this video. One final note: We didn't write this video script. We merely are passing it along as requested in the original viral email we we received. We merely added graphics and narration. Thank you. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 54787 CleanTVcom
McDone: Is McDonalds going the way of K Mart?
Remember those days when you saw that big turquoise and red K-Mart sign and you just wanted to rush in and buy a Slurpee and grab up all those bargains in your favorite new superstore? You could hardly believe such a 'paradise' actually existed. But today you may wonder why it still exists? Has K-Mart changed or have we changed--or have the times just changed? And remember biting into your first McDonald's cheeseburger and those french fries before they switched to frozen fries? There was no beating them. And that price? 20 cents for a cheeseburger and 15 cents for fries? Why bother shopping for food anymore? or why buy a house. Just move into a McDonalds next to a K-Mart. What else would you need? But times change and so do we. For some strange reason I no longer crave McDonalds burgers, and if I get the occasional urge to pig out of some of those fries, I don't finish them and if I dare go back to taste them again after they sat there a couple of hours, they seem to change into another substance--and it's not a good change. So is it any wonder that fast-food giant McDonald's sales are plummeting? Their total revenue dropped double digits for the first quarter of 2015, sinking a whopping 11% with its stock prices dropping 84 cents per share. If a local restaurant were to drop like that you might see a sign "under new management" appear while the landlord scrambles to find a new tenant. But what happens when you have 36,000 restaurants in over 100 countries sink that fast, or even go out of business? Will 100 different governments deem McDonalds 'too big to fail' and give them a supersized bailout? Time will tell but one thing is certain. No business can continue a drop like this for long without it eventually going belly up--or in this case: burger up. So if enough liberal demonstrators keep pushing for $15 per hour minimum wage for fast-food workers, they may actually accomplish their task of changing minimum wage at one burger chain to a new wage of zero dollars and zero cents, because that is the average pay rate of a non-existent company. Put a fork in me. I'm McDone. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 1665 CleanTVcom
Obama did not fall far from the (ACORN) tree!
NOTE: We received the transcript below from a friend and turned it into a video. We did not read the book, Rules for Radicals. We were just told by someone who read the book that this video attributes things to the book that are not in the book. Furthermore, Obama was only 11 when Alinsky died so while Obama was influenced by the philosophies in the book, he wasn't mentored in person by Alinski--however he was mentored by Frank Marshall Davis, who seems cut from the same cloth as Alinski. Sorry for the inaccuracies. We likely will pull down this video and upload a corrected one shortly. IF ANYONE HAS READ THE BOOK, PLEASE LET US KNOW WHAT IS INACCURATE WITH OUR VIDEO. Thank you. Transcript: Ah, all in a day's work... Obama was influenced by the writings and philosophies Saul Alinsky, author of the book, "Rules for Radicals," and later by Frank Marshall Davis, with similar philosophies. Barak Obama followed the philosophies of these 'role models' throughout his days as a Community Organizer for ACORN, using tactics that appeared to some as 'shaking down' businesses in exchange for not branding them 'hate groups.' And apparently Obama is still following those radical rules today. While we haven't read the book, we were told that according to Rules for Radicals there are 8 levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a Social State. The first is the most important. 1) Healthcare -- Control healthcare and you control the people 2) Poverty -- Increase the Poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live. 3) Debt -- Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control -- Remove the ability to defend themselves from the Government. That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare -- Take control of every aspect of their lives: Food, Housing, and Income. 6) Education -- Take control of what people read and listen to -- take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion -- Remove the belief in the God from the Government and schools. 8) Class Warfare -- Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take from the wealthy, as in taxing, with the support of the poor. Does any of this sound like what is happening in the United States ? ...This is the end of this video but it doesn't have to be the end of our nation if enough people wake up and wake up other. Will you please help save our nation by forwarding a link to this video to your congressman and to people you know? ...Thank you. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 8619 CleanTVcom
Something That Always Happens at Birth Is About To Change Forever
Everyone knows that right after a baby is born, the doctor clamps the umbilical cord, hands the scissors to the proud dad and mother and baby are officially separated. Right? Well, that's all about to change--forever. According to an article in Women's Day Magazine, after 10 years of effort, midwife Amanda Burleigh has prevailed in her mission to change baby birthing guidelines. For the past 60 years, traditional medical standards for delivering babies has called for cutting umbilical cords within seconds of birth. Midwife Amanda has battled to see delivery doctors and nurses keep the umbilical cord connecting mother and child long enough to allow the nutrient rich umbilical blood from mom's placenta to fully transfer to her baby. And now medical research that found solid evidence that she was absolutely right in her intuitive belief and it has been concluded that quick cord cutting deprives a baby of a whopping one third of its blood stock! They further concluded that babies deprived of that much stem cell rich blood can lead to cognitive learning delays and anemia. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 3325 CleanTVcom
Obama 1st President Not to See Single Year of 3% GDP Growth
On April 28, 2016 the United States Commerce Department made the historic announcement that the Gross Domestic Product, or GDP, grew at an anemic rate of a paltry half of one percent. That followed a pale fourth quarter advance of 1.4%. This puts Barack Obama on track for about a 1 1/2 percent for his 8 year term and it gives him the dubious distinction of having been the first U.S. President in history not to see a single year of 3% GDP growth. In comparison, President Ronald Reagan oversaw a real annual GDP growth rate of 3.5%, more than double that of Obama whose economic record is on track to rank the fourth worse of any President in history. But keep in mind, these statistics are coming from the Obama Administration and there are plenty of ways to cook the books, so to speak. Even with numerous gourmet economic chefs working overtime trying to find something redeemable about Obama's economic record, this is the best they can do? Makes me wonder: Is it possible that some day historians will look back and determine that the record of this current ObamaNation was the worst in history? Ouch.
Views: 2559 CleanTVcom
BREAKING: Obama Disarming U.S. Military Veterans!
We recently celebrated Independence Day. From that initial struggle against the British to the present day, we have honored our military veterans for their courageous sacrifice in helping keep us free. Sadly, many of these veterans have recently seen their courage “rewarded” with a gun ban. And this concerns all gun owners, because what is happening to our veterans through the Veteran’s Administration can happen to you someday through ObamaCare. But the problem with military veterans is not new. For nearly twenty years, Gun Owners of America has been keeping you informed about the anti-gun atrocities being performed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and the Justice Department against law-abiding veterans. The idea was first hatched during the Bill Clinton administration. And it works like this: When a veteran, as a result of a traumatic experience abroad, seeks disability benefits and/or counseling, the VA moves to appoint a guardian to manage that veteran’s financial affairs. Under illegitimate Bill Clinton interpretations by the ATF, this “inability to handle his (or her) financial affairs” would make the veteran “mentally defective” under 18 U.S.C. 922 (g) (4), and hence legally barred from owning a gun or ammunition. Unfortunately, another so-called pro-gun group worked with anti-gun Senator Chuck Schumer in 2007 and 2008 to pass the Veterans Disarmament Act, which codified these unlawful actions into statutory law. WND.com reported recently that people who live with veterans are now being ordered not to possess a gun, and get this, some veterans are being told they can “buy back” their gun rights by forgoing their VA benefits! One veteran, who is an attorney and who has studied this problem closely, said “this is illegal and is called extortion.” Currently, there could be as many as 200,000 military veterans who have been affected by this gun ban. It’s time to do something about it. For specific actions steps of how you may help our veterans get their guns back, visit: GunOwners.org ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 6205 CleanTVcom
Secret Emails may Nail  Obama
The new GOP majority in the U.S. Senate is turning up the heat on its investigation of allegations the Internal Revenue Service shared private taxpayer information with President Obama, demanding Obama turn over communications he and his staff had with the agency. The Washington Times reported it obtained a copy of a letter signed by Senate Finance Committee Chairman Sen. Orrin Hatch, R-Utah, and the 13 other Republicans on the panel. Addressed to Obama, the letter asks for his communications with the IRS since 2010 for their investigation into whether the agency has been engaging in illegal distribution of private taxpayer information. Republicans have accused the Obama administration of using the IRS as a political weapon since discovering the agency obstructed the applications for tax-exempt status of conservative organizations critical of Obama’s policies. The letter said: “We have an obligation to conduct oversight of the federal government’s administration of our tax laws. As part of this oversight, we are seeking to determine the degree to and manner in which the Internal Revenue Service shares taxpayer information with the executive office of the president.” IRS documents filed by the National Organization for Marriage, for example, were released to a citizen who asked for them, and they ended up in the hands of a homosexual activist who posted the confidential information online. A judge ruled the IRS simply made a mistake, but the agency agreed to pay the group $50,000. The documents requested by the Senate panel were also requested by the interest group Cause of Action, which has gone to court to try to compel the IRS inspector general to turn them over, the Times reported. The inspector general says it can’t turn over most of the 2,500 pages of records from its investigation because it would violate the privacy of taxpayers. Texas-based True the Vote and 42 other groups have filed a lawsuit claiming the IRS targeted them based on their beliefs and politics. Catherine Engelbrecht, founder of True the Vote, said the “notion that the IRS can target Americans for years because of their political beliefs is reprehensible.” The IRS exacerbated the scandal by repeatedly telling disbelieving congressional investigators that it couldn’t provide relevant emails because of hard-drive failures. U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton also ordered the agency to find out what happened to the hard drive after IRS Commissioner John Koskinen claimed a computer malfunction had caused the loss of two years of emails belonging to IRS executive Lois Lerner, whose tax-exempt division improperly targeted conservative groups. Lerner claimed her emails were lost when her hard drive crashed July 13, 2011. She said the crash caused her to lose all her emails sent to recipients outside the IRS from mid-2009 to mid-2011. David Ferriero, the archivist of the United States for the National Archives and Records Administration, testified the federal agency failed to follow the law in handling Lerner’s emails, raising even more suspicion about their content. A key House leader addressing the issue, Oversight Committee Chairman Darrell Issa, R-Calif., told IRS officials, at a minimum, “You did not tell the whole truth. The committee accused the IRS of sending the FBI a database containing more than a million pages of confidential taxpayer information. Officials later said the emails that had been “destroyed” were found, but they were unsorted and details were unavailable. Robert Wood commented in Forbes: “First, there was no targeting by the IRS. Then there was, but only by those rogue IRS employees down in Cincinnati. … Then, top IRS official Lois Lerner refused to testify. IRS Commissioner Miller seemed defiant too and was sacked. Then, there was a year-long congressional investigation before the IRS finally admitted the 2009 through 2011 Lois Lerner’s emails ‘disappeared.’ Then, the backups … were recycled. Then, the new IRS commissioner said the IRS needs a bigger tech budget.” Wood said American taxpayers, as well as thousands of dedicated IRS employees, deserve an explanation. “The vast bulk of them are doing their best and helping not hurting the system. Their position is undermined by the awful bumbling and worse the IRS scandal … has revealed.” Obama, meanwhile, insisted in an interview there’s “not even a smidgen of corruption” in the IRS. Read more at: http://www.wnd.com/2015/01/gop-senate-tells-obama-to-cough-up-emails/#k4flDLHWkxwJlmxG.99 ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 2192 CleanTVcom
Family Gets Back $80 Million in Gold Coins
A family was just given back a whopping $80 MILLION in gold coins that the government confiscated. In an overturned jury verdict, the U.S. Treasury Department received a bit of a spanking for being the big bad bully who took candy away from a baby. Or in this case $80 million in gold away from the family who found it and claimed 'finders keepers.' The government's argument was that the $80 million in $20 Double Eagle gold coins were stolen from the Philadelphia Mint before FDR took us off the gold standard in 1933, 70 years before Joan Langbord and her children found the coins. Coin experts at Swiss America say the treasure trove included coins designed by sculptor Augustus Saint-Gaudens who merged a flying eagle with a person representing liberty, adding that King Farouk of Egypt sold a single Double Eagle coin for $7.6 million, setting a record for a coin sale. But a far more valuable windfall was the half a million Double Eagle gold coins that were minted in Philadelphia in 1933 just before Roosevelt ended the gold standard. And just what happened to those half million coins? They were melted down into gold bars, completely killing the investment value of those coins. Who knows, you might have some of that valuable gold in your necklace or your gold crown. But this doesn't have to be the end of the story. It is still legal to own gold coins--for now. And some day if the government knocks on your door asking for your gold coins to melt down? A fair question might be: What gold coins? For further information on potential ownership of gold and silver coins, you may call: 800-Buy Coin or visit: http://www.SwissAmerica.com ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 3038 CleanTVcom
VA Declares Veterans Incompetent, Taking Their Guns, SS Recipients too!
First it was returning veterans who received letters from the Veterans’ Administration which stated that they were incompetent and no longer could legally own weapons. The same plan is now in the works for recipients of Social Security, according to the Los Angeles Times. The veterans have been declared incompetent without any legal hearing, since the declaration has been made for any so-called “disabled” veteran, whether the disability is mental or physical, as determined by Obama cronies. Veterans receiving the letter are given 60 days to prove they are “competent” and able to handle their own affairs. This is a direct violation of the Due Process clause of the Constitution, since the burden of proof in such cases should be on the government. But this is the new ObamaNation. Many of the veterans have neither been given hearings nor examined by a psychiatrist or psychologist.Then Attorney General Eric Holder decided that anyone who works for the VA can declare veterans incompetent for any reason including having their bills paid automatically out of their bank accounts.You heard that right: auto-payments. And veterans who question this ruling are being told that in order to have their Second Amendment right to own a firearm restored, they must sign a form that gives up all VA benefits! This is blackmail in an obvious form. To think this is the way Obama rewards our veteran’s for serving our country! To date, the Veteran’s Administration, the FBI, the Department of Defense, the BATF and the Department of Homeland Security have refused to turn over basic information that would document their actions. The government also seems to be violating medical privacy laws, since they are transferring information about veterans between agencies. Congress recently has begun investigating the issue. We can only hope they will find their courage to do the obvious and right thing, to protect our veteran’s rights to own and carry arms. No one questioned their competency to carry arms in war time when our country needed but now, instead of giving them a parade, the Obama administration has the unmitigated gall to pressure our veterans to give up their arms or give up their benefits! Yet as bad as this the Obamanator now has plans to extend these draconian rules to Social Security recipients. In an effort to get around Congress’ refusal to enact legislation banning or restricting guns, Obama has begun to rewrite rules and definitions dealing with firearms.As reported by the Los Angeles Times, targeted Social Security beneficiaries undoubtedly would also include numerous people who may just have a bad memory or difficulty balancing a checkbook. There are over 4 million recipients who have their payments managed by “representative payees.” And how does the Obama Administration justify such unconscionable attacks against our Veterans? Because of the possibility of returning veterans becoming radicalized by right-wing extremists so as to boost their “violent capabilities”Obama hasn’t yet come up with similar lame justification to deprive Social Security recipients of their Second Amendment rights but you can guarantee he’s working on concocting something. Please forward a link to this video to friends, relatives and your elected representatives to help get this message out in an effort to help our veterans who were there for us when we needed them. Let’s be there for them now. For more information on how you can help and for a myriad of information on gun rights, visit the web page of Gun Owners of America at: http://GunOwners.org
Views: 2458 CleanTVcom
Chris Pratt: NO MORE LOVE SCENES! To Honor God & Wife
Everyone loves a love story. And what makes a movie ever better is if is based on a true story. So what happens when you have a true love story and have it starring Chris Pratt? You get the real life love story of Chris Pratt, in a case of art imitating life imitating art. You see, Chris Pratt has made the public announcement that from this point forth, he refuses to participate in any movie love scenes. Why? For two reasons. One, he is married to the love of his life, comedy actress Anna Faris so he doesn't want to cheat on her even if it's just acting. And two: After having a child born prematurely Chris had an epiphany and renewed his faith in God. So while this Guardians of the Galaxy star's future love scenes will be limited to an audience of one, his likely role as the next Indiana Jones will have millions of adorning fans. But they'll have to be satisfied with his somewhat nerdy, witty action hero persona, and not with a love scene that leaves little to the imagination. Our hat's off to Chris Pratt. May you be a example for others in Hollywood and in television to emulate.
Views: 17646 CleanTVcom
Putin vs Obama
Views: 1031 CleanTVcom
Woman Brutally Murdered while waiting for Gun Permit
A woman got a restraining order against her former boyfriend, a convicted felon. But she didn't believe that was enough, so she tried to buy a handgun to protect herself. Only problem is that in New Jersey, they have draconian laws, so you wait and wait and--Oh, no! what was that? It's Carole Bowne's ex-boyfriend coming up her driveway with a knife! Had she only had a gun, the ex with the knife might have been the one bleeding on the ground instead of 39-year-old Carole who was brutally slashed and stabbed to death. Instead, her ex, 45-year-old Michael Eitel, successfully escaped and is at large, perhaps to repeat a similar heinous act to another unarmed person. Berlin Township Police Chief Leonard Check defended the process explaining that it take 2 months or longer for law enforcement to put together a file on each firearm applicant, including obtaining fingerprints and references on them. In Carole's case, he said they were still waiting for her fingerprint information to come back. Well, at least the police have the fingerprints on the knife that stabbed and killed this New Jersey firearm applicant. But as bad as the wait is in New Jersey, it is worse in other states. According to Erich Pratt of Gun Owners of America, "In New York, it can take over a year to get a legal handgun but if you are a criminal, you can get a gun for $50 in a New York Minute." For further information on the right to bear arms, visit the Gun Owners of America web site at: GunOwners.org or their Facebook page at: Facebook.com/GunOwners Please email a link to this video to friends and loved ones who might benefit from this information. Thank you. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 977 CleanTVcom
CANCER IN CANS: Acrylamide Chips
Homepage: http://www.CleanTV.com Just when you thought it was safe to grab some munchies in the cupboard, a new study warns of cancer in cans and bags—in cans of Pringles and in bags of a myriad of other potato chips. This disturbing truth about an all-time favorite snack may be forcing food manufacturers to change their processing methods. But can the changes really make a difference? Researchers find that potato chips, among other processed foods, are loaded with the cancer causing chemical, acrylamide (uh-kril-uh-mahyd). The substance forms when carbohydrate-rich foods are cooked at very high temperatures. Some of the worst offenders—Pringles and other potato chips and French fries. Federal regulations limit acrylamide in drinking water to just over one-tenth micrograms per 8-ounce glass. However, a six-ounce serving of French fries can contain 60 micrograms of acrylamide. That's about FIVE HUNDRED times over the allowable limit. Scientists find the amount in potato chips is even more staggering. In some cases, more than NINE HUNDRED times over the legal limit. Such studies prompted the state of California to sue potato chip makers in 2005, citing a failure to warn consumers about the health risks of acrylamide in their products. The Frito-Lay company and several other potato chip manufacturers agreed to a settlement in 2008. The companies pledged to reduce the acrylamide levels in their chips to 275 parts-per-billion by 2011, which is low enough to avoid needing a cancer warning label. But the jury is still out on whether or not manufacturers have truly reached the requirements. A major challenge lies in how the food is made. Since acrylamide is not intentionally added, but rather a byproduct of cooking or processing at temperatures above 212-degrees Fahrenheit, researchers believe that changes in the current manufacturing methods would reduce acrylamide intake by no more than 40 percent . This brings the question--have potato chip makers really succeeded in reducing acrylamide levels to within legal limits? That data has yet to be updated. However researchers do issue another warning—baked potato chips may be worse for you than fried. The U.S. Food and Drug Administration found acrylamide levels in baked chips may be at more than three times the level of acrylamide as regular chips! This comes as name brands such as Pringles and companies like Frito Lay advertise so-called healthier baked varieties of their products. In fact, research suggests that baking processed potatoes at high temperatures may be one of the worst ways to cook them. FDA findings on the name brand Ore Ida may prove the point. A study shows Ore Ida Golden Fries contain about 107 parts-per-billion of acrylamide in the regular fried variety, but the baked version contains nearly 11-HUNDRED parts-per-billion. And if that were not enough, published research also shows dozens more potential toxins form when processed food is heated to high temperatures. In the study published in 2007, scientists concluded that consumers are far less likely to ingest dangerous levels of acrylamide and other carcinogens when eating home-cooked foods compared to industrially-prepared snacks. Still, some potato chip manufacturers are working to improve the image of their products. By the end of 2011, about half of Pepsi's Frito-Lay brand snacks will be reformulated with all-natural ingredients. The switch is part of PepsiCo's master plan to tap into the healthy foods market share. The Wall Street Journal recently reported the company hopes to boost their nutrition business from $10 billion dollars to $30 billion dollars by 2020. Some 60 Frito-Lay brand snacks are scheduled for an all-natural makeover, with the company removing monosodium glutamate—also known as MSG—and replacing it with natural seasonings, such as molasses and paprika. Artificial colors will be replaced with beet juice, purple cabbage and carrots. Nutritionists warn that the reformulated chips still lack true health benefits and that the processing depletes food of valuable micronutrients. They urge consumers to eat foods that are raw or minimally processed to avoid the types of toxic byproducts that come from industrially manufactured snacks. Health care experts agree that cancer, heart disease, obesity, and diabetes have a dietary component. That, with these latest findings on toxins in convenience foods may be causing a shift in consumer demand and altering the direction of food manufacturers in a positive way. This video script has been based largely on a much longer article by Joseph Mercola that is available for viewing on his web site at: http://www.mercola.com/ ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 85835 CleanTVcom
New Gun forms require Race, Ethnicity
The world watched riots and strike in Ferguson, Missouri over Barack Obama and Eric Holder engaging in blatant race baiting and fanning the flames of racism. And just when you thought it couldn't get worse, now the Obama National political strife machine has rolled out another race-oriented initiative that has virtually escaped notice by the mainstream news media. The Obama administration has begun quietly forcing new gun buyers to declare their race and ethnicity, according to The Washington Times. This inexplicable new policy change provides little law enforcement value while creating the risk of privacy intrusions and racial profiling, reports the Times. With little fanfare, the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives in 2012 amended its Form 4473 which is required for gun purchases, to identify buyers as either Latino, Hispanic, or not, as well as requiring the gun buyer to list his or her race as Black, Asian, White, Indian or Pacific Islander or white. We can hear it now, "Oh, my, we have located a Pacific Islander who just bought a gun, a jug of Hawaiian Punch and some Captain Crunch cereal at stores on the same city block on the same day. That fits the profile of a suspected serial killer. Send in the drones." Give me a break. But conspicuous by its absence were any questions on the form inquiring if someone was Muslim or Middle Eastern or part of a known terror group. But who cares about that? At least we'll know if Pacific Islanders are stockpiling weapons... Needless to say, the amendment is causing headaches galore for gun retailers, since they must fill in each and every new privacy-invading box exactly correctly or risk getting a visit from an A T F swat team. As reported by The Washington Times each box on the form needs to be checked off or else it’s an A T F violation — severe enough for the government to shut a business down. Frequently people skip over the Hispanic/Latino box and only check their race, or vice versa — both of which are federal errors that can be held against the gun dealer. So, while the Obama administration accuses conservatives of committing acts of racism, this liberal regime is leading the parade in setting back decades of civil rights gains. The big question is, what will the government do with the data they gather from this gross intrusion of privacy? But when The Washington Times contacted the ATF to answer this question, officials declined to comment on why race and ethnicity information are needed in the first place or what they are used for. Please forward a link to this video to fellow American citizens who might be concerned about yet one more "change" being given to us by the squatter-in-chief, who demands that we show race and national origin, while he has still not shown us his long form birth certificate or his college records proving he wasn't a foreign student, ineligible to be President of The United States. And come to think of it, didn't Barack Hussein Obama grow up in Indonesia and later move to Hawaii? Hum. That fits the profile of a Pacific Islander. Original article: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/sep/16/obama-white-house-forcing-new-gun-buyers-to-declar/#ixzz3DZxgmcMl ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 4862 CleanTVcom
Obama Hiding College Transcripts
Barack Obama and Wayne Allyn Root both claim to be 1983 Columbia graduates. Obama's classmate Root can produce all the paperwork necessary to support his history. But, we are forced to accept Obama's college claims by faith. So, why, after all these years, are Barry Soetero's records still sealed? Root asks some provocative questions. Is it possible that releasing Barry's, or should we say, Barack's records would prove that he attended Occidental College, and Columbia University as a foreign exchange student? We know Obama was raised in Indonesia, and came to Hawaii after his mother abandoned him. Was young Barry told that foreign exchange students could receive scholarships and financial aid not available to Americans? Would release of those transcripts prove his foreign citizenship? And as a foreign citizen, he clearly is ineligible to remain in office as President of the United States. This is serious. This is no game. We know that children play games. Even college age kids often enjoy playing hide and seek from their parents, or their parents' morals, during their college years. But Obama is a grown man now, and college was a long time ago. It's unusual for a grown man to play "hide and seek''--especially when that man is President of the United States. But instead of releasing his college records once and for all to set the record straight, Obama shamelessly turned the tables, demanding Mitt Romney to release his tax returns. He and his political pawns have spent weeks now playing the game, desperately attempting to divert attention from the real documentation issue, all the while, playing the lapdog major media like a fiddle. Time is ticking (clock sound with man counting..."One, Two, Three..." Barack Obama is counting on the fact that we won't discover his college records before this November's election. (Man counting..."Four") Yes, four years after Barack Obama's potentially embarrassing transcripts and other materials should have been made public, they remain sealed. It's been said, "Donkey kicks me once, donkey's fault. Donkey kicks me twice, my fault." So are we just going to just sit there and keep getting kicked by donkeys? Or are we willing to do something about this immature and inexcusable game of Hide and Seek? Enjoy watching any of hundreds of more videos at http://www.Clean.TV ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 17861 CleanTVcom
7 Surprising Ways You're Ruining Your Teeth
Good Housekeeping Magazine tells us: 7 Surprising Ways You're Ruining Your Teeth Since you only get one set of teeth, be careful not to make these 7 common mistakes: 1. Brushing Too Hard with a hard bristle toothbrush can wear away your tooth enamel, cause sensitivity and gum recession. Use soft bristles and move it in small circles, not side to side. (show toothpaste and brush) 2. Eating too Many Acidic Foods can wear away enamel causing pain from hot or cold food or drinks. Culprits: carbonated drinks, orange juice, wine, sports drinks, sour gummy candies, and lemons. Think of your teeth as seashells. If you them in Coke they disappear. If you must drink coke, drink through a straw. 3. Too Much Teeth Whitening can erode the enamel and cause sensitivity. 4. Eating Hot Pizza With a Cold Drink Eating pizza expands your enamel and drinking cold drinks causes contraction leading to hairline cracks. 5. Using a toothpaste that is too abrasive. Anything over 100 on the RDA scale is too abrasive. Colgate is 70. Arm & Hammer Dental Care PM is a whopping 168. 6. Using your teeth as tools such as a bottle opener, ice crusher or nail polish bottles opener, each of which can crack teeth or pop out fillings. 7. Not Brushing and Flossing Enough. And if you're short on time and can only do one, choose to....floss! ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 1623 CleanTVcom
Was Muhammad a Prophet? by I.Q. al-Rassooli
The following video was written by I.Q. al-Rassooli and is presented for public discussion: Let us look at the definition of the word and then the Islamic records to find out if Muhammad was a True Prophet. Prophet: A person who PREDICTS, or claims to be able to PREDICT, what will happen in the FUTURE. From this root comes Prophecy, Prophesy & Prophetic, all of which are associated with foretelling future events. Not once in the Quran, did Muhammad predict a future event that actually came true. Al Imran 3: 179 “Allah will not ….disclose to you (Muhammad) the secrets of the Unseen…..” Al A’araf 7:188 “Say: "I have no power over any good or harm to myself except as Allah willeth. If I (Muhammad) had knowledge of the unseen I should have multiplied all good and no evil should have touched me I am but a WARNER and a bringer of glad tidings to those who have faith." Yusuf 10:20 They say: "Why is not a Miracle sent down to him from his Lord?" Say: "The Unseen is only for Allah (to know). Then wait ye: I too (Muhammad) will wait with you." Al Jinn 72:26 “ He (Allah) alone knows the Unseen nor does He make any one acquainted with His Mysteries” In none of the above verses does Muhammad claim any knowledge of the future. On the contrary, he and Allah insist that he is incapable of doing so. That Muhammad was only a WARNER to his people. Sahih Al-Bukhari Hadith 9.477 Narrated by Masruq 'Aisha said, "If anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen his Lord, he is a liar, for Allah says: 'No vision can grasp Him.' And if anyone tells you that Muhammad has seen the Unseen (can tell the FUTURE) is a liar, for Allah says: "None has the knowledge of the Unseen but Allah." Al Baqara 2: 204 “There is the type of man whose speech about this world's life may dazzle thee and he calls Allah to witness about what is in his heart; yet he is the most contentious of enemies” So there you have it, straight from the mouth of Muhammad, saying that he is not a Prophet. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 3059 CleanTVcom
Judge Blasts Court for forcing her to Dismiss Arpaio Case
An appeals court has affirmed the dismissal of Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s lawsuit against the Obama administration over his amnesty-by-executive-order plan because the District of Columbia Court of Appeals determined he didn’t have “standing” to bring a complaint. That is, he couldn’t identify a specific and personal injury that he would suffer because of the amnesty. But one judge said it’s time for changes. “Today we hold that the elected sheriff of the nation’s fourth largest county, located mere miles from our border with Mexico, cannot challenge the federal government’s deliberate non-enforcement of the immigration laws,” wrote Judge Janice Rogers Brown. She said while precedent requires the appeals court to uphold the dismissal of the case, “I write separately to … note the consequences of our modern obsession with a myopic and constrained notion of standing.” She explained “what the government views as permissible prosecutorial discretion, Sheriff Arpaio views as a violation of the president’s duty to ‘take care that the laws be faithfully executed’ … and the non-delegation doctrine.” His concerns, Brown wrote, “run deeper than a difference in philosophy or politics. He claims [Obama's amnesty] impose clear and ‘severe’ harms on his ability to protect the people of Maricopa county. In particular, he argues that deferring removal proceedings and providing work authorizations to undocumented immigrants ‘harmed … his office’s finances, workload and interfered with the conduct of his duties…’” Brown said it’s logical for the sheriff to believe he has a case. But Brown wrote that the case had to be dismissed because of precedent, even though “the relevant judicial guideposts do not exactly ‘define standing ‘with complete consistency.” This concludes the first 8 paragraphs of a much longer article published by WND.com The whole article is available at: http://tinyurl.com/WNDjoe
Views: 928 CleanTVcom
I am a Liberal
I am a Liberal. I support the right to kill you for the first 9 months of your life and even a little bit afterward, if no one is looking. I support gun free zones so you cannot defend yourself or anyone else if any of my disenfranchised brothers or sisters expresses their righteous rage. I am against Wall Street and small business--especially if it is located in Ferguson, Missouri or any other city where I decide racial injustice has been perpetrated. I detest all you breeders who keep bringing in future generations who will be breathing my air. I support bigger government und unlimited taxpayer-funded spending on gender bender hormones and other new needs of the day. I say open the Southern gates and let future liberal voters in by the tens of millions to even the score, to have free and fair elections where anyone who arrives at a voting station can cast a private vote without identification. And while we're at it, let's make Election Day a national holiday with polls only open 9 to 5. I oppose all forms of private education and outlawing homeschooling. Let everyone get a public school education from pre-school to college graduation day, so we are all on the same page on the vital social issues of the day. I'm for banning all forms of Judeo-Christian religion but allowing Islam and secular humanism. I'm for total 24/7 surveillance so that the business class pays their fair share. I'm for merging America with the world for governance since sovereignty is so last-millennium. I oppose Climate Change and am willing to sacrifice trillions of dollars of other people's money, to fight climate until it changes no more. I am a Liberal. And I vote.
Views: 880 CleanTVcom
How 2 Nerds Found Most Valuable Treasure in US History!
Have you heard about how a couple of data nerds found a 131-year-old sunken treasure? It's a fascinating story of how Tommy Thompson and his neighbor Bob Evans found the most valuable sunken treasure in U.S. history. About 21 tons of gold coins and bars was being carried by a ship called the SS Central America that ran into some bad weather--a hurricane, actually. Tommy started stapling together some 8 1/2 x 11 sheets of paper and went to the library to search through microfilm. Remember this was in the 1980s before nerds had advanced databases or Google search tools. Instead, they, with the assistance of Larry Stone, used something called Baysian Theory, which, ironically is the base foundation on how modern search engines work. It involves pouring through large sets of data to narrow down the most likely area of finding the intended target, in this case, treasure. The two of them did their level best to calculate such things as which way the winds were blowing at the time of the sinking and even seemingly remotely antidotal data in order to create an algorithm to determine the most likely location of the sunken treasure. It was called a Data Correlation Matrix Combined Narrative, plotting the course of the USS Central America's course from Havana on September 8, 1857 toward New York. To make a long story short, the data nerds followed the trail of headwinds measured in knots, charted the net speed of the ship, it's intended trajectory and the amount of deflected direction from the initial winds that accelerated into a tropical storm, and lo and behold, they found the projected sinking point. X marks the spot, so to speak, except you can't exactly draw an X on the surface of the ocean. Oh, and one more thing, it was a fairly large X--about the area size of Rhode Island! Hey, at least they narrowed it down from searching the entire Atlantic Ocean. So they took a floating high tech sonar machine, er, well, high tech from 1980s standpoint. And after a false alarm, finding a sunken ship--without gold--they went back to work and found the right ship about 200 miles off shore--with about a ton of gold in it! They scooped it up, headed to land and whisked it away in three packed Brinks armored trucks. But that was when the nice guy nerds ran into a whole host of gold digging opportunists including 39 different insurance companies that filed lawsuits, laying claim to the gold, saying they were entitled to it because they paid insurance claims on the lost treasure in the 1800s. Lesson learned? Finding the gold wasn't easy but it proved to the easiest part. For years they navigated the treacherous waters of federal courtrooms for 10 years and 43 million dollars in legal fees and loans. But eventually Team Tommy prevailed, winning the rights to the gold, selling it for $48 million dollars, and having $6 million left over for the investors--The rest is history and their story is being told on--the History Channel? Ha! Gotcha. Nope. It's coming soon from ESPN Films! And the adventure story is titled, "In Deep Water." Now isn't that a sportin' good ending to this story! But it doesn't have to be the end for you. Perhaps this is just the beginning. Have you ever considered investing in rare gold coins? For a free booklet called Rediscovering Gold in the 21st Century, call: 800-Buy Coin (800-289-2646) Or visit: http://www.SwissAmerica.com ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 472328 CleanTVcom
Agenda 21: UN Global Control masked as Environmentalism!
If you haven’t heard of either Agenda 21 or sustainable development, you soon will. The Pope’s new encyclical has been called “Agenda 21 on steroids” and he’ll be giving the initial speech in September, at the U.N. conference on a new sustainable development initiative. What this really is about isn’t “social justice” or saving the planet, as promoters claim. Rather, it’s about inventory and control of everyone and everything. It’s communitarianism. Glenn Beck has said that, “Those pushing...government control on a global level have mastered the art of hiding it in plain sight and then just dismissing it as a joke,” by calling critics, ‘conspiracy theorists’. But even the 2012 Republican National Committee platform stated, “We strongly reject the U.N. Agenda 21 as erosive of American sovereignty.” It’s hard to label them conspiracy buffs. At the 1992 Earth Summit in Rio, George H.W. Bush signed on, then Clinton promoted it. This isn’t a partisan issue but an elite one. According to Democrats Against Agenda 21, one of the main problems it cites is, “the affluence of Americans,” and a major component seeks to lower American living standards to redistribute wealth. It calls for doing away with all private property decisions by giving control to government. Individual rights are subordinate to community needs, with governing bodies determining those needs. And as fantastic as this sounds, it actually is aimed at reducing populations and removing people from huge tracts of land, and packing them into “islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation.” The Wildlands Project, another component, describes how most of the land freed up will be set aside for wildlife. Rosa Koire, author of, “Behind the Green Mask,” said that it’s, “the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land,” water, minerals, plants, animals, construction, means of production, energy, education, information, and people. It’s already being introduced slowly by local planning commissions across the US through deceptive means, such as regulating property until it’s useless to owners. Apparently this isn’t fast enough for either the U.N. or the Pope. We hope appreciated this video written by Georgann Ryan. Please forward a copy to a friend. Thank you. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 2094 CleanTVcom
Last Words of Jesus
Hear Him speak, watch Him die, be changed forever. Take a front row seat at THE sentinel event in all of history. The crucifixion of Jesus Christ! Much has been written about the last words of notable figures in history....but What about the Last words of the MOST famous person to ever walk the face of the earth? And how could these words change Your life some 2000 years later? While hanging on the tree of death, Jesus Christ spoke seven words of Life. As blood flowed from His wounds, life flowed from His words! And What did the savior of the world say.... -About forgiveness? 'Father forgive them for they know not what they do' (A word of prayer) -Salvation for the least likely? 'Today shalt thou be with me in paradise' (A word of pardon) -Social justice from the cross? 'Woman behold thy son! Disciple behold thy mother!' (A word of paternity) - How to face the darkest depths of pain? 'My God, My God why hast thou forsaken me' (A word of pain) -Enduring The height of physical suffering? 'I thirst' (A Word of passion) -Experiencing the reality of ultimate fulfillment? 'It is finished!' (A word of perfection) -How to receive eternal life and truly 'rest in peace'? 'Father into thy hands I commend my spirit' (A word of peace) The one who was wounded Prayed 'father forgive', the one who was robbed gave pardon to the thief. He cared for the widow with a son and a pace to live. He was forsaken, so we could be with Him. The water of life cried ' I thirst' He said 'it is finished' for all to hear it, and then he cried 'into thy hands I commend my spirit' Seven words of life He cried, Seven words in his last breath, Seven words as Jesus died Seven words of life from the tree of death In Stu Epperson's new book 'Last words of Jesus' you'll read about what Jesus said as He died. Learn What He meant by these profound statements? and how it could change your life forever! Listen as the greatest Preacher of all time gives seven of the greatest sermons in history. Seven messages delivered from His wooden pulpit—a rough-hewn Roman cross. Seven earth-shattering statements proclaimed on an outdoor stage morbidly shaped like a skull. The seven Last Words of Jesus. Hear Him speak, watch Him die, be changed forever! ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 12984 CleanTVcom
Blood test shows EVERY virus you've EVER had! By VirScan
There's a new blood test that can determine EVERY virus you've EVER had in your life! How's that possible? It's a DNA-based test called VirScan that acts like a detective, searching your blood for 206 specific clues in the form of antibodies, each created in response to the presence of a prior viruses within the human body. Sounds so simple. You kind of wonder what took researches so long to develop this test based on such a logical premise. This is amazing. Each of our bodies have up to 206 measurable markers that blow the whistle on every virus we've ever had--including some viruses that have come and gone that we possibly never even knew we had. In the study published in the journal Science, it explained how old diagnostic methods were limited to testing a person for suspected viruses. But this new test uses the detected antibodies as a virtual blueprint for virtually every virus a person has ever been in contact with. Surprising to some was that when scientists tested 569 people, they discovered that the average person had only been exposed to 10 viruses in their life. But it actually makes sense since there can be many different strains of a particular virus. The best example of this is the rhinovirus, otherwise known as the common cold. Considering there are many people walking around with viruses like Hepatitis C and HIV without knowing it since it often takes years before the person becomes symptomatic, VirScan can be a priceless indicator of future health. And speaking of money, you may ask how much money does it cost for this newfangled virus test? The answer may surprise you. The current cost per blood sample is only about $25. And from the time of testing until time of results is between 2 and 3 days. For more information on this test or other modern medical testing or treatments, contact Henry Van Pala, MD. His web site is: http://www.NorthHillsInternalMedicine.com Or call Dr. Henry Van Pala at: (919) 977-1675 Or visit Dr. Van Pala's medical offices at: North Hills Internal and Integrated Medicine 4822 Six Forks Road Suite 104 Raleigh, NC 27609 And please forward a link of this video to any friends or family members who might appreciate learning about the new VirScan test. Science Magazine article on VirScan: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6239/aaa0698 ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 2789 CleanTVcom
Saudi diplomats use Slaves in Virginia?
Immigration officials are "investigating" a complaint at one of the many Saudi owned mansions in McLean, Virginia where domestic workers were allegedly kept in conditions of slavery and William J. Murray, the chairman of the Religious Freedom Coalition, has demanded that the Obama Administration take action. Immigration and Custom Enforcement spokesman Brandon Montgomery said two women, both from the Philippines, who were "possible" victims of domestic servitude were rescued from the home on May 2nd, 2013. Neither the Saudi Ambassador or the State Department would reveal the names of the Saudi officials living in the home, however, local records indicate that the most probably resident is Saudi Embassy defense attaché Brigadier General Amin Muhammad Shaker, although others Saudis are linked to the property as well. William Murray said, "Sadly this is by no means the first time diplomats from Saudi Arabia have held domestic workers against their will. The diplomats are just continuing a tradition from Saudi Arabia where many guest workers become domestic slaves. " A current report by the United Nations High Commission For Refugees (UNHCR) states: "Saudi Arabia is a destination country for men and women subjected to forced labor and to a lesser extent, forced prostitution. Men and women from Bangladesh, India, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Pakistan, the Philippines, Indonesia, Sudan, Ethiopia, Kenya, and many other countries voluntarily travel to Saudi Arabia as domestic servants or other low-skilled laborers, but some subsequently face conditions indicative of involuntary servitude, including nonpayment of wages, long working hours without rest, deprivation of food, threats, physical or sexual abuse, and restrictions on movement such as the withholding of passports or confinement to the workplace." William J. Murray said, "Saudi diplomats believe they can practice the same crimes against humanity in Virginia as are common in Saudi Arabia. President Obama needs to make clear to the despots who run the criminal enterprise known as the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia that they must stop this outrage on American soil. ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 8091 CleanTVcom
I Love You but I'm Not IN LOVE With You
What exactly does that statement mean anyway? Marriage expert Mort Fertel explains that if a person who says, “I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you,” he or she is making a distinction between 2 different feelings. But NEITHER of those feelings are love! Mort, author and founder of Marriage Fitness, further explains that when a person says, “I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you,” they’re saying that I CARE about you but I’m not EXCITED about you. Wow! Now that is profound. CARING about someone is a good thing. It’s reflective of CONCERN. But it’s different than love. I care about the starving children in Africa, but I don’t love them. And I'm not married to any of them. Being EXCITED about someone is also a good thing. But it’s different than love. I might be excited to have a relationship with the President of the United States or a Hollywood star, but that doesn’t mean I love them. While someone who says, “I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you” is expressing their confusion about what love really is. And that’s why they’re having marital problems and possibly even having an adulterous affair with someone they may feel they are IN LOVE with. Love is something we articulate in the vocabulary of ACTION. Love is a verb. It’s not a feeling you get from another PERSON; it’s an experience you receive as a result of DEEDS YOU DO for another person and commitment you have toward that person. And those deeds are not a secret. In other words, love is NOT a mystery! There are specific things you can do with your spouse to solve your problems and build love in your marriage. Just as there are physical laws of the universe such as gravity, there are also laws for relationships. Just as the right diet and exercise program makes you physically stronger or thinner, certain habits in your relationship WILL make your marriage stronger. It's a direct cause and effect. According to Mort Fertel, if you know and apply the laws, and while the results are predictable, you still can't “make” love per se. This is exactly why Mort Fertel created the Marriage Fitness program. He wanted to offer people a step-by-step system how to make and maintain love in their marriage. And Mort says that the program works for any marriage, even if only one spouse does it! "Very often," says Mort, "in my private phone sessions, someone will say to me, 'I love my spouse, but I’m not IN LOVE with my spouse.' "My immediate response is to ask, 'Can you list for me five ways in the last week that you’ve DEMONSTRATED your love for your spouse?' "I usually hear noise on the other end of the phone; grunts, partial statements, and gasps for breath, but none of what I hear ever passes for an answer to my question. “Hearing 'I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you' is a cop out. It basically means that I have no clue how to make a relationship last LONG-TERM so I’m exiting to get high from another short-term romance. But whoever they’re IN LOVE with now will also eventually hear, 'I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you.' Of course, this is all fine and good, but it’s really your spouse who needs to hear this, right?" Do NOT print this email out and give it to your spouse. And do NOT tell them what Mort said. Getting your spouse from the stage of “I love you, but I’m not IN LOVE with you” to the next level up of, “Okay, let’s give this another chance,” is a tricky task. So, if this is your situation, it’s crucial you handle it properly. One false step and your marriage could be over. But if you take the right steps, you can draw your spouse back in and begin to restore your marriage TOGETHER. To learn the right steps, get Mort Fertel's free report “7 Secrets to Fixing Your Marriage” from his web site at: marriage180.com
Views: 35106 CleanTVcom
How to Overthrow a Republic? Import Millions, Pay Welfare!
In 1887 Alexander Tyler, a Scottish history professor at the University of Edinburgh, had this to say about the fall of the Athenian Republic some 2,000 years prior: "A democracy is always temporary in nature; it simply cannot exist as a permanent form of government. A democracy will continue to exist up until the time that voters discover that they can vote themselves generous gifts from the public treasury. From that moment on, the majority always votes for the candidates who promise the most benefits from the public treasury, with the result that every democracy will finally collapse over loose fiscal policy, (which is) always followed by a dictatorship." "The average age of the world's greatest civilizations from the beginning of history, has been about 200 years. During those 200 years, these nations always progressed through the following sequence: From bondage to spiritual faith; From spiritual faith to great courage; From courage to liberty; From liberty to abundance; From abundance to complacency; From complacency to apathy; From apathy to dependence; From dependence back into bondage." If something isn't done soon to reverse the course of this pattern in the United States, our possible obituary might read as follows: The Late Great Republic of The United States America, dead at age 250 Born 1776, Died 2026. IF this is the case, the final 10 years countdown has begun for our demise. Professor Joseph Olson of Hamline University School of Law in St. Paul, Minnesota, pointed out some interesting facts concerning the last Presidential election: Number of States won: Obama: 19 Romney: 29 Square miles of land won: Obama: 580,000 Romney: 2,427,000 Murder rate per 100,000 residents in counties won: Obama: 13.2 Romney: 2.1 Professor Olson adds: "In aggregate, the map of the territory Romney won was mostly the land owned by the taxpaying citizens of the country. Obama territory mostly encompassed those citizens living in low income tenements and living off various forms of government welfare..." Olson believes the United States is now somewhere between the "complacency and apathy" phase of Professor Tyler's definition of democracy, with some forty percent of the nation's population already having reached the "governmental dependency" phase. And once the dependency stage takes firm root, political correctness becomes the law of the land. Whatever the overlords of the dictatorship and their complicit propaganda news media deems right for the people is the only mantra allowed to be spoken by the citizens of which they enslave. If Congress grants amnesty and citizenship to twenty million criminal invaders called illegal's and they vote - then we can say goodbye to the USA in about 5 to 10 years. If you are in favor of the end of our Republic, then don't forward a copy of this link to your friends, family and co-workers. But if you do want to help spread the message for US to snap of our current complacency, apathy and dependence, we welcome you to do so since apathy is perhaps the single greatest danger to our freedom.
Views: 462 CleanTVcom
Trust in Media at all time low, GALLUP POLL
Newsflash: Trust in the news media is at an all time low. That's according to the latest Gallup Poll. Falling from a 55% level of trust in 1999, the trust level has plummeted to a paltry 40% of people trusting the mass media in 2014. Wow! In only 15 years we have dropped from the majority of Americans believing the news, to the point where today two and a half times more people distrust versus trust the news media. I would hope that our videos have contributed some to this rightfully place distrust. But think about the implications of this downward spiral. The news is supposed to be an objective source of truth. So, if people are not receiving the truth from the news, where are they supposed to get it? They certainly don't have the time to contact both sides of all breaking news stories. And even if they got through, who would they believe? So, clearly, there is a need for truthful sources of news. How else can a society survive, based on lies and half truths? Perhaps the best source for truth is The Internet, in both text and video news and commentary formats. We work hard reporting news stories truthfully--especially in 3 categories of news: Unreported news, under reported news and falsely reported news. Now don't get me wrong, there is still plenty of disinformation on the Internet and you need to be discerning but it's a wonderful source of truth if you can rightfully separate the dross from the gold. But before we end this video and allow you to go back to scouring the Internet for truth, let's take a quick look at what people groups the Gallup Poll says trust the media most and least. The majority of Democrats trust the major news media. Of course this should not shock a discerning person like you. For years we have seen most major news outlets become more bias and much more liberal. But what is remarkable is that even Democrats trust the news less than before. In 2005 70% of Democrats trusted the news. Today it is 55%. In 1998 the Gallup Poll found 52% of Republicans trusting the major news media. In 2014 that trust level has sunk to a mere 27%. And moving from distrust to bias, the poll shows 71% of Republicans believing the major news media is too liberal. What I can't understand is why even 29% of Republicans don't see the bias. Ah, the eye candy of the handsome hosts and lovely ladies with their nice smiles... The Kool-Aide tastes so sweet. So where do we go from here? We continue to BE the news media. Search the Internet for stories you believe are true and of vital interest and forward those stories to friends and enemies alike. And perhaps the next time someone asks them where they get their trusted news, they'll say... From you! (put on screen: Source article: http://www.gallup.com/poll/176042/trust-mass-media-returns-time-low.aspx ...and view more videos on our website at: http://Clean.TV
Views: 1141 CleanTVcom